mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scalable regret for learning to control network-coupled subsystems with unknown dynamics

arXiv 2108.07970 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2021eess.SY cs.AI cs.SYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of controlling an unknown linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) system consisting of multiple subsystems connected over a network. Our goal is to minimize and quantify the regret (i.e. loss in performance) of our strategy with respect to an oracle who knows the system model. Viewing the interconnected subsystems globally and directly using existing LQG learning algorithms for the global system results in a regret that increases super-linearly with the number of subsystems. Instead, we propose a new Thompson sampling based learning algorithm which exploits the structure of the underlying network. We show that the expected regret of the proposed algorithm is bounded by tildeO big( n √T big) where n is the number of subsystems, T is the time horizon and the tildeO(·) notation hides logarithmic terms in n and T. Thus, the regret scales linearly with the number of subsystems. We present numerical experiments to illustrate the salient features of the proposed algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2021.

Builds on

26 of 46 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018Fully Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Networked Agentscited by 189
  2. 2020Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQRcited by 111
  3. 2018Regret Bounds for Robust Adaptive Control of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 86
  4. 2019Learning Linear-Quadratic Regulators Efficiently with only √T Regretcited by 67
  5. 2014Near-optimal Reinforcement Learning in Factored MDPscited by 41
  6. 2019Distributed Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Linear Quadratic Control: A Derivative-Free Policy Optimization Approachcited by 33
  7. 2020Multi Type Mean Field Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
  8. 2019Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Networked Agents: Recent Advancescited by 23
  9. 2018On Adaptive Linear-Quadratic Regulatorscited by 21
  10. 2018Input Perturbations for Adaptive Control and Learningcited by 18
  11. 2020Efficient Optimistic Exploration in Linear-Quadratic Regulators via Lagrangian Relaxationcited by 18
  12. 2020Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Factored MDPs with Application to Constrained RLcited by 16
14 more
  1. 2017Optimism-Based Adaptive Regulation of Linear-Quadratic Systemscited by 14
  2. 2019Certainty Equivalence is Efficient for Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 13
  3. 2014Bayesian Optimal Control of Smoothly Parameterized Systems: The Lazy Posterior Sampling Algorithmcited by 11
  4. 2017Learning-based Control of Unknown Linear Systems with Thompson Samplingcited by 10
  5. 2020Policy Gradient-based Algorithms for Continuous-time Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 9
  6. 2020Reinforcement Learning in Non-Stationary Discrete-Time Linear-Quadratic Mean-Field Gamescited by 8
  7. 2018Finite Time Adaptive Stabilization of LQ Systemscited by 7
  8. 2021Learning Distributed Stabilizing Controllers for Multi-Agent Systemscited by 5
  9. 2018Distributed Q-Learning for Dynamically Decoupled Systemscited by 4
  10. 2020Thompson sampling for linear quadratic mean-field teamscited by 3
  11. 2020Distributed Q-Learning with State Tracking for Multi-agent Networked Controlcited by 2
  12. 2016Linear Quadratic Mean Field Teams: Optimal and Approximately Optimal Decentralized Solutionscited by 1
  13. 2020Optimal control of network-coupled subsystems: Spectral decomposition and low-dimensional solutionscited by 1
  14. 2020Team-Optimal Solution of Finite Number of Mean-Field Coupled LQG Subsystemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.

2 papers.