mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Adaptive Linear-Quadratic Regulators

arXiv 1806.10749 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2018eess.SY cs.SY eess.SPcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Performance of adaptive control policies is assessed through the regret with respect to the optimal regulator, which reflects the increase in the operating cost due to uncertainty about the dynamics parameters. However, available results in the literature do not provide a quantitative characterization of the effect of the unknown parameters on the regret. Further, there are problems regarding the efficient implementation of some of the existing adaptive policies. Finally, results regarding the accuracy with which the system's parameters are identified are scarce and rather incomplete. This study aims to comprehensively address these three issues. First, by introducing a novel decomposition of adaptive policies, we establish a sharp expression for the regret of an arbitrary policy in terms of the deviations from the optimal regulator. Second, we show that adaptive policies based on slight modifications of the Certainty Equivalence scheme are efficient. Specifically, we establish a regret of (nearly) square-root rate for two families of randomized adaptive policies. The presented regret bounds are obtained by using anti-concentration results on the random matrices employed for randomizing the estimates of the unknown parameters. Moreover, we study the minimal additional information on dynamics matrices that using them the regret will become of logarithmic order. Finally, the rates at which the unknown parameters of the system are being identified are presented.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 10; 2022: 8; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Joint Learning of Linear Time-Invariant Dynamical Systemscited by 16
  2. 2022Learning Mixtures of Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 15
  3. 2021Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Partially Observable Contextual Multi-Armed Banditscited by 10
  4. 2022Learning to Control Linear Systems can be Hardcited by 10
  5. 2022Thompson Sampling Achieves tilde O(√T) Regret in Linear Quadratic Controlcited by 8
  6. 2022Augmented RBMLE-UCB Approach for Adaptive Control of Linear Quadratic Systemscited by 5
  7. 2021Finite-time System Identification and Adaptive Control in Autoregressive Exogenous Systemscited by 4
  8. 2021Strong Consistency and Rate of Convergence of Switched Least Squares System Identification for Autonomous Markov Jump Linear Systemscited by 4
  9. 2022Joint Learning-Based Stabilization of Multiple Unknown Linear Systemscited by 3
  10. 2022Efficient Algorithms for Learning to Control Bandits with Unobserved Contextscited by 3
  11. 2021Towards a Dimension-Free Understanding of Adaptive Linear Controlcited by 2
  12. 2021Scalable regret for learning to control network-coupled subsystems with unknown dynamicscited by 2
9 more
  1. 2021Bayesian Algorithms Learn to Stabilize Unknown Continuous-Time Systemscited by 2
  2. 2022Worst-case Performance of Greedy Policies in Bandits with Imperfect Context Observationscited by 2
  3. 2026Posterior Sampling Reinforcement Learning with Gaussian Processes for Continuous Control: Sublinear Regret Bounds for Unbounded State Spacescited by 2
  4. 2021A relaxed technical assumption for posterior sampling-based reinforcement learning for control of unknown linear systemscited by 1
  5. 2021Safe Linear-Quadratic Dual Control with Almost Sure Performance Guaranteecited by 0
  6. 2021Reinforcement Learning Policies in Continuous-Time Linear Systemscited by 0
  7. 2022Regret Analysis of Certainty Equivalence Policies in Continuous-Time Linear-Quadratic Systemscited by 0
  8. 2023Almost Surely √T Regret for Adaptive LQRcited by 0
  9. 2023Finite Time Regret Bounds for Minimum Variance Control of Autoregressive Systems with Exogenous Inputscited by 0