mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Certainty Equivalence is Efficient for Linear Quadratic Control

arXiv 1902.07826 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2019math.OC cs.LG stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the performance of the certainty equivalent controller on Linear Quadratic (LQ) control problems with unknown transition dynamics. We show that for both the fully and partially observed settings, the sub-optimality gap between the cost incurred by playing the certainty equivalent controller on the true system and the cost incurred by using the optimal LQ controller enjoys a fast statistical rate, scaling as the square of the parameter error. To the best of our knowledge, our result is the first sub-optimality guarantee in the partially observed Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) setting. Furthermore, in the fully observed Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), our result improves upon recent work by Dean et al. (2017), who present an algorithm achieving a sub-optimality gap linear in the parameter error. A key part of our analysis relies on perturbation bounds for discrete Riccati equations. We provide two new perturbation bounds, one that expands on an existing result from Konstantinov et al. (1993), and another based on a new elementary proof strategy.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 5.

13 papers.

Sort: