Active Learning for Massively Parallel Translation of Constrained Text into Low Resource Languages
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We translate a closed text that is known in advance and available in many languages into a new and severely low resource language. Most human translation efforts adopt a portion-based approach to translate consecutive pages/chapters in order, which may not suit machine translation. We compare the portion-based approach that optimizes coherence of the text locally with the random sampling approach that increases coverage of the text globally. Our results show that the random sampling approach performs better. When training on a seed corpus of ~1,000 lines from the Bible and testing on the rest of the Bible (~30,000 lines), random sampling gives a performance gain of +11.0 BLEU using English as a simulated low resource language, and +4.9 BLEU using Eastern Pokomchi, a Mayan language. Furthermore, we compare three ways of updating machine translation models with increasing amount of human post-edited data through iterations. We find that adding newly post-edited data to training after vocabulary update without self-supervision performs the best. We propose an algorithm for human and machine to work together seamlessly to translate a closed text into a severely low resource language.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2021.
Builds on
18 of 58 references.
References · 18
- 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 798
- 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 788
- 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 469
- 2017OpenNMT: Open-source Toolkit for Neural Machine Translationcited by 251
- 2016Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 188
- 2016Dual Learning for Machine Translationcited by 148
- 2018When and Why are Pre-trained Word Embeddings Useful for Neural Machine Translation?cited by 126
- 2016Multi-Way, Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with a Shared Attention Mechanismcited by 117
- 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 117
- 2018Meta-Learning for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 105
- 2018Rapid Adaptation of Neural Machine Translation to New Languagescited by 82
- 2016Toward Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with Universal Encoder and Decodercited by 76
6 more
- 2020Pre-training Multilingual Neural Machine Translation by Leveraging Alignment Informationcited by 64
- 2016Multi-Source Neural Translationcited by 37
- 2015Multilingual Language Processing From Bytescited by 26
- 2018Massively Parallel Cross-Lingual Learning in Low-Resource Target Language Translationcited by 6
- 2018Paraphrases as Foreign Languages in Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 5
- 2021Family of Origin and Family of Choice: Massively Parallel Lexiconized Iterative Pretraining for Severely Low Resource Machine Translationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 40
- 2024To Label or Not to Label: Hybrid Active Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
- 2023Train Global, Tailor Local: Minimalist Multilingual Translation into Endangered Languagescited by 0
- 2024Massively Multilingual Text Translation For Low-Resource Languagescited by 0
- 2024To Label or Not to Label: Hybrid Active Learning for Neural Machine Translation14 Mar 2024
- 2024Massively Multilingual Text Translation For Low-Resource Languages29 Jan 2024
- 2023Train Global, Tailor Local: Minimalist Multilingual Translation into Endangered Languages5 May 2023
- 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processing18 Oct 2022