A Better Loss for Visual-Textual Grounding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given a textual phrase and an image, the visual grounding problem is the task of locating the content of the image referenced by the sentence. It is a challenging task that has several real-world applications in human-computer interaction, image-text reference resolution, and video-text reference resolution. In the last years, several works have addressed this problem by proposing more and more large and complex models that try to capture visual-textual dependencies better than before. These models are typically constituted by two main components that focus on how to learn useful multi-modal features for grounding and how to improve the predicted bounding box of the visual mention, respectively. Finding the right learning balance between these two sub-tasks is not easy, and the current models are not necessarily optimal with respect to this issue. In this work, we propose a loss function based on bounding boxes classes probabilities that: (i) improves the bounding boxes selection; (ii) improves the bounding boxes coordinates prediction. Our model, although using a simple multi-modal feature fusion component, is able to achieve a higher accuracy than state-of-the-art models on two widely adopted datasets, reaching a better learning balance between the two sub-tasks mentioned above.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2021.
Builds on
43 of 63 references.
References · 43
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
- 2019Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 1,361
- 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
- 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
- 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
- 2015Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptionscited by 897
- 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 454
31 more
- 2016Multimodal Compact Bilinear Pooling for Visual Question Answering and Visual Groundingcited by 243
- 2014Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Modelscited by 197
- 2019A Fast and Accurate One-Stage Approach to Visual Groundingcited by 194
- 2015Learning Deep Structure-Preserving Image-Text Embeddingscited by 139
- 2015Natural Language Object Retrievalcited by 124
- 2017Learning Two-Branch Neural Networks for Image-Text Matching Taskscited by 119
- 2015Grounding of Textual Phrases in Images by Reconstructioncited by 112
- 2020Contrastive Learning for Weakly Supervised Phrase Groundingcited by 102
- 2020Enhancing Geometric Factors in Model Learning and Inference for Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 98
- 2014Deep Captioning with Multimodal Recurrent Neural Networks (m-RNN)cited by 94
- 2019Improving Referring Expression Grounding with Cross-modal Attention-guided Erasingcited by 88
- 2017Grounding Referring Expressions in Images by Variational Contextcited by 82
- 2019Zero-Shot Grounding of Objects from Natural Language Queriescited by 79
- 2015Where To Look: Focus Regions for Visual Question Answeringcited by 64
- 2018Improved Fusion of Visual and Language Representations by Dense Symmetric Co-Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 51
- 2017Conditional Image-Text Embedding Networkscited by 50
- 2020Cops-Ref: A new Dataset and Task on Compositional Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 50
- 2018Rethinking Diversified and Discriminative Proposal Generation for Visual Groundingcited by 49
- 2019Learning Cross-modal Context Graph for Visual Groundingcited by 49
- 2017Weakly-supervised Visual Grounding of Phrases with Linguistic Structurescited by 40
- 2017Query-guided Regression Network with Context Policy for Phrase Groundingcited by 34
- 2016Phrase Localization and Visual Relationship Detection with Comprehensive Image-Language Cuescited by 33
- 2018Knowledge Aided Consistency for Weakly Supervised Phrase Groundingcited by 32
- 2018Multi-level Multimodal Common Semantic Space for Image-Phrase Groundingcited by 32
- 2015Simple Baseline for Visual Question Answeringcited by 24
- 2019Phrase Localization Without Paired Training Examplescited by 24
- 2019Neural Sequential Phrase Grounding (SeqGROUND)cited by 20
- 2014Fisher Vectors Derived from Hybrid Gaussian-Laplacian Mixture Models for Image Annotationcited by 16
- 2018Interpretable and Globally Optimal Prediction for Textual Grounding using Image Conceptscited by 15
- 2019Phrase Grounding by Soft-Label Chain Conditional Random Fieldcited by 4
- 2017An End-to-End Approach to Natural Language Object Retrieval via Context-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.