mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Better Loss for Visual-Textual Grounding

arXiv 2108.05308 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given a textual phrase and an image, the visual grounding problem is the task of locating the content of the image referenced by the sentence. It is a challenging task that has several real-world applications in human-computer interaction, image-text reference resolution, and video-text reference resolution. In the last years, several works have addressed this problem by proposing more and more large and complex models that try to capture visual-textual dependencies better than before. These models are typically constituted by two main components that focus on how to learn useful multi-modal features for grounding and how to improve the predicted bounding box of the visual mention, respectively. Finding the right learning balance between these two sub-tasks is not easy, and the current models are not necessarily optimal with respect to this issue. In this work, we propose a loss function based on bounding boxes classes probabilities that: (i) improves the bounding boxes selection; (ii) improves the bounding boxes coordinates prediction. Our model, although using a simple multi-modal feature fusion component, is able to achieve a higher accuracy than state-of-the-art models on two widely adopted datasets, reaching a better learning balance between the two sub-tasks mentioned above.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2021.

Builds on

43 of 63 references.

References · 43

  1. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  2. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  3. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  4. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  5. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  6. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  7. 2019Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 1,361
  8. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
  9. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  10. 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
  11. 2015Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptionscited by 897
  12. 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 454
31 more
  1. 2016Multimodal Compact Bilinear Pooling for Visual Question Answering and Visual Groundingcited by 243
  2. 2014Unifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language Modelscited by 197
  3. 2019A Fast and Accurate One-Stage Approach to Visual Groundingcited by 194
  4. 2015Learning Deep Structure-Preserving Image-Text Embeddingscited by 139
  5. 2015Natural Language Object Retrievalcited by 124
  6. 2017Learning Two-Branch Neural Networks for Image-Text Matching Taskscited by 119
  7. 2015Grounding of Textual Phrases in Images by Reconstructioncited by 112
  8. 2020Contrastive Learning for Weakly Supervised Phrase Groundingcited by 102
  9. 2020Enhancing Geometric Factors in Model Learning and Inference for Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 98
  10. 2014Deep Captioning with Multimodal Recurrent Neural Networks (m-RNN)cited by 94
  11. 2019Improving Referring Expression Grounding with Cross-modal Attention-guided Erasingcited by 88
  12. 2017Grounding Referring Expressions in Images by Variational Contextcited by 82
  13. 2019Zero-Shot Grounding of Objects from Natural Language Queriescited by 79
  14. 2015Where To Look: Focus Regions for Visual Question Answeringcited by 64
  15. 2018Improved Fusion of Visual and Language Representations by Dense Symmetric Co-Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 51
  16. 2017Conditional Image-Text Embedding Networkscited by 50
  17. 2020Cops-Ref: A new Dataset and Task on Compositional Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 50
  18. 2018Rethinking Diversified and Discriminative Proposal Generation for Visual Groundingcited by 49
  19. 2019Learning Cross-modal Context Graph for Visual Groundingcited by 49
  20. 2017Weakly-supervised Visual Grounding of Phrases with Linguistic Structurescited by 40
  21. 2017Query-guided Regression Network with Context Policy for Phrase Groundingcited by 34
  22. 2016Phrase Localization and Visual Relationship Detection with Comprehensive Image-Language Cuescited by 33
  23. 2018Knowledge Aided Consistency for Weakly Supervised Phrase Groundingcited by 32
  24. 2018Multi-level Multimodal Common Semantic Space for Image-Phrase Groundingcited by 32
  25. 2015Simple Baseline for Visual Question Answeringcited by 24
  26. 2019Phrase Localization Without Paired Training Examplescited by 24
  27. 2019Neural Sequential Phrase Grounding (SeqGROUND)cited by 20
  28. 2014Fisher Vectors Derived from Hybrid Gaussian-Laplacian Mixture Models for Image Annotationcited by 16
  29. 2018Interpretable and Globally Optimal Prediction for Textual Grounding using Image Conceptscited by 15
  30. 2019Phrase Grounding by Soft-Label Chain Conditional Random Fieldcited by 4
  31. 2017An End-to-End Approach to Natural Language Object Retrieval via Context-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.