Using Visual Anomaly Detection for Task Execution Monitoring
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Execution monitoring is essential for robots to detect and respond to failures. Since it is impossible to enumerate all failures for a given task, we learn from successful executions of the task to detect visual anomalies during runtime. Our method learns to predict the motions that occur during the nominal execution of a task, including camera and robot body motion. A probabilistic U-Net architecture is used to learn to predict optical flow, and the robot's kinematics and 3D model are used to model camera and body motion. The errors between the observed and predicted motion are used to calculate an anomaly score. We evaluate our method on a dataset of a robot placing a book on a shelf, which includes anomalies such as falling books, camera occlusions, and robot disturbances. We find that modeling camera and body motion, in addition to the learning-based optical flow prediction, results in an improvement of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.752 to 0.804, and the area under the precision-recall curve from 0.467 to 0.549.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2021.
Builds on
15 of 30 references.
References · 15
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2018Real-world Anomaly Detection in Surveillance Videoscited by 570
- 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 560
- 2017Future Frame Prediction for Anomaly Detection -- A New Baselinecited by 391
- 2018A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Imagescited by 281
- 2019RoboNet: Large-Scale Multi-Robot Learningcited by 268
- 2019Anomaly Detection in Video Sequence with Appearance-Motion Correspondencecited by 118
- 2019Street Scene: A new dataset and evaluation protocol for video anomaly detectioncited by 89
- 2020A Survey of Single-Scene Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 88
- 2018Time-Agnostic Prediction: Predicting Predictable Video Framescited by 37
- 2020Safe Robot Navigation via Multi-Modal Anomaly Detectioncited by 33
- 2019Future Frame Prediction Using Convolutional VRNN for Anomaly Detectioncited by 27
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2022Unsupervised Anomaly Detection from Time-of-Flight Depth Imagescited by 6
- 2026EmbodiedSkills: A Unified Framework for Orchestrating, Training, and Deploying VLA Agentscited by 2
- 2024Locally Adaptive One-Class Classifier Fusion with Dynamic ℓp-Norm Constraints for Robust Anomaly Detectioncited by 0
- 2025Enhancing Video-Based Robot Failure Detection Using Task Knowledgecited by 0
- 2025ViSTR-GP: Online Cyberattack Detection via Vision-to-State Tensor Regression and Gaussian Processes in Automated Robotic Operationscited by 0
- 2025Visual Anomaly Detection for Reliable Robotic Implantation of Flexible Microelectrode Arraycited by 0
- 2026RoboVAD: A Large Cross-Domain Evaluation Benchmark for Anomaly Detection in Robotic Arm Manipulation Videoscited by 0
- 2026RoboVAD: A Large Cross-Domain Evaluation Benchmark for Anomaly Detection in Robotic Arm Manipulation Videos15 Sep 2026
- 2026EmbodiedSkills: A Unified Framework for Orchestrating, Training, and Deploying VLA Agents1 Sep 2026
- 2025Visual Anomaly Detection for Reliable Robotic Implantation of Flexible Microelectrode Array10 Oct 2025
- 2025ViSTR-GP: Online Cyberattack Detection via Vision-to-State Tensor Regression and Gaussian Processes in Automated Robotic Operations13 Sep 2025
- 2025Enhancing Video-Based Robot Failure Detection Using Task Knowledge26 Aug 2025
- 2024Locally Adaptive One-Class Classifier Fusion with Dynamic ℓp-Norm Constraints for Robust Anomaly Detection10 Nov 2024
- 2022Unsupervised Anomaly Detection from Time-of-Flight Depth Images2 Mar 2022