ViSTR-GP: Online Cyberattack Detection via Vision-to-State Tensor Regression and Gaussian Processes in Automated Robotic Operations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Industrial robotic systems are central to automating smart manufacturing operations. Connected and automated factories face growing cybersecurity risks that can potentially cause interruptions and damages to physical operations. Among these attacks, data-integrity attacks often involve sophisticated exploitation of vulnerabilities that enable an attacker to access and manipulate the operational data and are hence difficult to detect with only existing intrusion detection or model-based detection. This paper addresses the challenges in utilizing existing side-channels to detect data-integrity attacks in robotic manufacturing processes by developing an online detection framework, ViSTR-GP, that cross-checks encoder-reported measurements against a vision-based estimate from an overhead camera outside the controller's authority. In this framework, a one-time interactive segmentation initializes SAM-Track to generate per-frame masks. A low-rank tensor-regression surrogate maps each mask to measurements, while a matrix-variate Gaussian process models nominal residuals, capturing temporal structure and cross-joint correlations. A frame-wise test statistic derived from the predictive distribution provides an online detector with interpretable thresholds. We validate the framework on a real-world robotic testbed with synchronized video frame and encoder data, collecting multiple nominal cycles and constructing replay attack scenarios with graded end-effector deviations. Results on the testbed indicate that the proposed framework recovers joint angles accurately and detects data-integrity attacks earlier with more frequent alarms than all baselines. These improvements are most evident in the most subtle attacks. These results show that plants can detect data-integrity attacks by adding an independent physical channel, bypassing the controller's authority, without needing complex instrumentation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2025.
Builds on
10 of 55 references.
References · 10
- 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
- 2022A Unified Model for Multi-class Anomaly Detectioncited by 268
- 2023Segment and Track Anythingcited by 193
- 2022Decoupling Features in Hierarchical Propagation for Video Object Segmentationcited by 148
- 2019Camera-to-Robot Pose Estimation from a Single Imagecited by 48
- 2024Multi-Sensor Object Anomaly Detection: Unifying Appearance, Geometry, and Internal Propertiescited by 26
- 2017Multivariate Gaussian and Student-t Process Regression for Multi-output Predictioncited by 14
- 2021Using Visual Anomaly Detection for Task Execution Monitoringcited by 7
- 2020SoK: Attacks on Industrial Control Logic and Formal Verification-Based Defensescited by 4
- 2020A Survey of Cybersecurity of Digital Manufacturingcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.