mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Theorem Proving Components

arXiv 2107.10034 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2021cs.LO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Saturation-style automated theorem provers (ATPs) based on the given clause procedure are today the strongest general reasoners for classical first-order logic. The clause selection heuristics in such systems are, however, often evaluating clauses in isolation, ignoring other clauses. This has changed recently by equipping the E/ENIGMA system with a graph neural network (GNN) that chooses the next given clause based on its evaluation in the context of previously selected clauses. In this work, we describe several algorithms and experiments with ENIGMA, advancing the idea of contextual evaluation based on learning important components of the graph of clauses.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2021.

Builds on

9 of 38 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018Reinforcement Learning of Theorem Provingcited by 69
  2. 2017ENIGMA: Efficient Learning-based Inference Guiding Machinecited by 26
  3. 2020ENIGMA Anonymous: Symbol-Independent Inference Guiding Machine (system description)cited by 26
  4. 2019ENIGMA-NG: Efficient Neural and Gradient-Boosted Inference Guidance for Ecited by 24
  5. 2013MizAR 40 for Mizar 40cited by 23
  6. 2019Property Invariant Embedding for Automated Reasoningcited by 22
  7. 2019Hammering Mizar by Learning Clause Guidancecited by 20
  8. 2018Learning to Reason with HOL4 tacticscited by 14
  9. 2016Extending E Prover with Similarity Based Clause Selection Strategiescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

7 papers.