mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Property Invariant Embedding for Automated Reasoning

arXiv 1911.12073 ↗First posted 27 Nov 2019cs.AI cs.LG cs.LOcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated reasoning and theorem proving have recently become major challenges for machine learning. In other domains, representations that are able to abstract over unimportant transformations, such as abstraction over translations and rotations in vision, are becoming more common. Standard methods of embedding mathematical formulas for learning theorem proving are however yet unable to handle many important transformations. In particular, embedding previously unseen labels, that often arise in definitional encodings and in Skolemization, has been very weak so far. Similar problems appear when transferring knowledge between known symbols. We propose a novel encoding of formulas that extends existing graph neural network models. This encoding represents symbols only by nodes in the graph, without giving the network any knowledge of the original labels. We provide additional links between such nodes that allow the network to recover the meaning and therefore correctly embed such nodes irrespective of the given labels. We test the proposed encoding in an automated theorem prover based on the tableaux connection calculus, and show that it improves on the best characterizations used so far. The encoding is further evaluated on the premise selection task and a newly introduced symbol guessing task, and shown to correctly predict 65% of the symbol names.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024A Survey on Deep Learning for Theorem Provingcited by 57
  2. 2021Neural Termination Analysiscited by 16
  3. 2021Learning to Guide a Saturation-Based Theorem Provercited by 15
  4. 2021The Role of Entropy in Guiding a Connection Provercited by 8
  5. 2021Fast and Slow Enigmas and Parental Guidancecited by 8
  6. 2022The Isabelle ENIGMAcited by 8
  7. 2021Learning Theorem Proving Componentscited by 7
  8. 2024Learning Guided Automated Reasoning: A Brief Surveycited by 7
  9. 2023MizAR 60 for Mizar 50cited by 6
  10. 2021A Study of Continuous Vector Representationsfor Theorem Provingcited by 4
  11. 2023An Ensemble Approach for Automated Theorem Proving Based on Efficient Name Invariant Graph Neural Representationscited by 4
  12. 2022Machine Learning Meets The Herbrand Universecited by 3
10 more
  1. 2024Application of AI to formal methods - an analysis of current trendscited by 2
  2. 2021Improving ENIGMA-Style Clause Selection While Learning From Historycited by 1
  3. 2022Adversarial Learning to Reason in an Arbitrary Logiccited by 1
  4. 2022Exploring Representation of Horn Clauses using GNNs (Extended Technical Report)cited by 1
  5. 2023gym-saturation: Gymnasium environments for saturation provers (System description)cited by 1
  6. 2024Solving Hard Mizar Problems with Instantiation and Strategy Inventioncited by 1
  7. 2026Names Don't Matter: Symbol-Invariant Transformer for Open-Vocabulary Learningcited by 1
  8. 2025Efficient Neural Clause-Selection Reinforcementcited by 0
  9. 2025Partial Label Learning for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 0
  10. 2026Imitation Learning for Connection-Tableau Constructioncited by 0