mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ENIGMA-NG: Efficient Neural and Gradient-Boosted Inference Guidance for E

arXiv 1903.03182 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2019cs.AI cs.LG cs.LOcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We describe an efficient implementation of clause guidance in saturation-based automated theorem provers extending the ENIGMA approach. Unlike in the first ENIGMA implementation where fast linear classifier is trained and used together with manually engineered features, we have started to experiment with more sophisticated state-of-the-art machine learning methods such as gradient boosted trees and recursive neural networks. In particular the latter approach poses challenges in terms of efficiency of clause evaluation, however, we show that deep integration of the neural evaluation with the ATP data-structures can largely amortize this cost and lead to competitive real-time results. Both methods are evaluated on a large dataset of theorem proving problems and compared with the previous approaches. The resulting methods improve on the manually designed clause guidance, providing the first practically convincing application of gradient-boosted and neural clause guidance in saturation-style automated theorem provers.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 11; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024A Survey on Deep Learning for Theorem Provingcited by 55
  2. 2021TacticZero: Learning to Prove Theorems from Scratch with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
  3. 2021Learning to Guide a Saturation-Based Theorem Provercited by 15
  4. 2024Graph2Tac: Online Representation Learning of Formal Math Conceptscited by 15
  5. 2021Proving Theorems using Incremental Learning and Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 13
  6. 2021Vampire With a Brain Is a Good ITP Hammercited by 10
  7. 2025Grammars of Formal Uncertainty: When to Trust LLMs in Automated Reasoning Taskscited by 9
  8. 2021The Role of Entropy in Guiding a Connection Provercited by 8
  9. 2021Fast and Slow Enigmas and Parental Guidancecited by 8
  10. 2022The Isabelle ENIGMAcited by 8
  11. 2021Online Machine Learning Techniques for Coq: A Comparisoncited by 7
  12. 2021Learning Theorem Proving Componentscited by 7
12 more
  1. 2024Learning Guided Automated Reasoning: A Brief Surveycited by 7
  2. 2023MizAR 60 for Mizar 50cited by 6
  3. 2021Learning Equational Theorem Provingcited by 5
  4. 2021A Study of Continuous Vector Representationsfor Theorem Provingcited by 4
  5. 2023Reinforcement Learning and Data-Generation for Syntax-Guided Synthesiscited by 3
  6. 2024Application of AI to formal methods - an analysis of current trendscited by 2
  7. 2021Improving ENIGMA-Style Clause Selection While Learning From Historycited by 1
  8. 2023Translating SUMO-K to Higher-Order Set Theorycited by 0
  9. 2024Considerations on Approaches and Metrics in Automated Theorem Generation/Finding in Geometrycited by 0
  10. 2024Learning Rules Explaining Interactive Theorem Proving Tactic Predictioncited by 0
  11. 2025Efficient Neural Clause-Selection Reinforcementcited by 0
  12. 2026Twitch: Learning Abstractions for Equational Theorem Provingcited by 0