mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ENIGMA Anonymous: Symbol-Independent Inference Guiding Machine (system description)

arXiv 2002.05406 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2020cs.AI cs.LG cs.LOcited by 26

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We describe an implementation of gradient boosting and neural guidance of saturation-style automated theorem provers that does not depend on consistent symbol names across problems. For the gradient-boosting guidance, we manually create abstracted features by considering arity-based encodings of formulas. For the neural guidance, we use symbol-independent graph neural networks (GNNs) and their embedding of the terms and clauses. The two methods are efficiently implemented in the E prover and its ENIGMA learning-guided framework. To provide competitive real-time performance of the GNNs, we have developed a new context-based approach to evaluation of generated clauses in E. Clauses are evaluated jointly in larger batches and with respect to a large number of already selected clauses (context) by the GNN that estimates their collectively most useful subset in several rounds of message passing. This means that approximative inference rounds done by the GNN are efficiently interleaved with precise symbolic inference rounds done inside E. The methods are evaluated on the MPTP large-theory benchmark and shown to achieve comparable real-time performance to state-of-the-art symbol-based methods. The methods also show high complementarity, solving a large number of hard Mizar problems.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 7; 2025: 2.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024A Survey on Deep Learning for Theorem Provingcited by 55
  2. 2024Graph2Tac: Online Representation Learning of Formal Math Conceptscited by 15
  3. 2021Proving Theorems using Incremental Learning and Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 13
  4. 2021Vampire With a Brain Is a Good ITP Hammercited by 10
  5. 2021The Role of Entropy in Guiding a Connection Provercited by 8
  6. 2021Fast and Slow Enigmas and Parental Guidancecited by 8
  7. 2022The Isabelle ENIGMAcited by 8
  8. 2021Learning Theorem Proving Componentscited by 7
  9. 2024Learning Guided Automated Reasoning: A Brief Surveycited by 7
  10. 2023MizAR 60 for Mizar 50cited by 6
  11. 2021Learning from Lukasiewicz and Meredith: Investigations into Proof Structures (Extended Version)cited by 5
  12. 2023An Ensemble Approach for Automated Theorem Proving Based on Efficient Name Invariant Graph Neural Representationscited by 4
14 more
  1. 2022Gym-saturation: an OpenAI Gym environment for saturation proverscited by 3
  2. 2022Machine Learning Meets The Herbrand Universecited by 3
  3. 2021Learning to solve geometric construction problems from imagescited by 2
  4. 2023Investigations into Proof Structurescited by 2
  5. 2024Application of AI to formal methods - an analysis of current trendscited by 2
  6. 2021Improving ENIGMA-Style Clause Selection While Learning From Historycited by 1
  7. 2022Adversarial Learning to Reason in an Arbitrary Logiccited by 1
  8. 2024Guiding Word Equation Solving using Graph Neural Networks (Extended Technical Report)cited by 1
  9. 2022Feynman on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, with Updatescited by 0
  10. 2023Translating SUMO-K to Higher-Order Set Theorycited by 0
  11. 2024Machine Learning for Quantifier Selection in cvc5cited by 0
  12. 2024Learning Rules Explaining Interactive Theorem Proving Tactic Predictioncited by 0
  13. 2025Efficient Neural Clause-Selection Reinforcementcited by 0
  14. 2025When GNNs Met a Word Equations Solver: Learning to Rank Equations (Extended Technical Report)cited by 0