GGT: Graph-Guided Testing for Adversarial Sample Detection of Deep Neural Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Neural Networks (DNN) are known to be vulnerable to adversarial samples, the detection of which is crucial for the wide application of these DNN models. Recently, a number of deep testing methods in software engineering were proposed to find the vulnerability of DNN systems, and one of them, i.e., Model Mutation Testing (MMT), was used to successfully detect various adversarial samples generated by different kinds of adversarial attacks. However, the mutated models in MMT are always huge in number (e.g., over 100 models) and lack diversity (e.g., can be easily circumvented by high-confidence adversarial samples), which makes it less efficient in real applications and less effective in detecting high-confidence adversarial samples. In this study, we propose Graph-Guided Testing (GGT) for adversarial sample detection to overcome these aforementioned challenges. GGT generates pruned models with the guide of graph characteristics, each of them has only about 5% parameters of the mutated model in MMT, and graph guided models have higher diversity. The experiments on CIFAR10 and SVHN validate that GGT performs much better than MMT with respect to both effectiveness and efficiency.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2021.
Builds on
34 of 55 references.
References · 34
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 579
- 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
22 more
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
- 2020HRank: Filter Pruning using High-Rank Feature Mapcited by 291
- 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
- 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
- 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
- 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
- 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 144
- 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 123
- 2019Graph Representation Learning: A Surveycited by 75
- 2020Graph Structure of Neural Networkscited by 67
- 2018DeepMutation: Mutation Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 66
- 2018DLFuzz: Differential Fuzzing Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 64
- 2021Adversarial Example Detection for DNN Models: A Review and Experimental Comparisoncited by 51
- 2019AutoCompress: An Automatic DNN Structured Pruning Framework for Ultra-High Compression Ratescited by 49
- 2018Adversarial Sample Detection for Deep Neural Network through Model Mutation Testingcited by 48
- 2021Detecting Adversarial Examples from Sensitivity Inconsistency of Spatial-Transform Domaincited by 29
- 2020Towards Characterizing Adversarial Defects of Deep Learning Software from the Lens of Uncertaintycited by 26
- 2019Testing DNN Image Classifiers for Confusion & Bias Errorscited by 17
- 2020Towards Understanding the Regularization of Adversarial Robustness on Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2019Towards Understanding Adversarial Examples Systematically: Exploring Data Size, Task and Model Factorscited by 10
- 2018Target Defense Against Link-Prediction-Based Attacks via Evolutionary Perturbationscited by 7
- 2019IoT Device Fingerprint using Deep Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.