mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A new smart-cropping pipeline for prostate segmentation using deep learning networks

arXiv 2107.02476 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2021eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prostate segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a challenging task. In recent years, several network architectures have been proposed to automate this process and alleviate the burden of manual annotation. Although the performance of these models has achieved promising results, there is still room for improvement before these models can be used safely and effectively in clinical practice. One of the major challenges in prostate MR image segmentation is the presence of class imbalance in the image labels where the background pixels dominate over the prostate. In the present work we propose a DL-based pipeline for cropping the region around the prostate from MRI images to produce a more balanced distribution of the foreground pixels (prostate) and the background pixels and improve segmentation accuracy. The effect of DL-cropping for improving the segmentation performance compared to standard center-cropping is assessed using five popular DL networks for prostate segmentation, namely U-net, U-net+, Res Unet++, Bridge U-net and Dense U-net. The proposed smart-cropping outperformed the standard center cropping in terms of segmentation accuracy for all the evaluated prostate segmentation networks. In terms of Dice score, the highest improvement was achieved for the U-net+ and ResU-net++ architectures corresponding to 8.9% and 8%, respectively.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2021.

Builds on

27 of 53 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  7. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  8. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  9. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  10. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,128
  11. 2014Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  12. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 659
15 more
  1. 2015Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Networkcited by 515
  2. 2017Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Netcited by 333
  3. 2019ResUNet++: An Advanced Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 211
  4. 2016A guide to convolution arithmetic for deep learningcited by 182
  5. 2018An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRIcited by 140
  6. 2018Activation Functions: Comparison of trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learningcited by 130
  7. 2019Deep Semantic Segmentation of Natural and Medical Images: A Reviewcited by 124
  8. 2020A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusioncited by 84
  9. 2017On Loss Functions for Deep Neural Networks in Classificationcited by 68
  10. 2018Fully Dense UNet for 2D Sparse Photoacoustic Tomography Artifact Removalcited by 56
  11. 2020Optimization for Medical Image Segmentation: Theory and Practice when evaluating with Dice Score or Jaccard Indexcited by 52
  12. 2019Recent Advances in Deep Learning for Object Detectioncited by 50
  13. 2016Is the deconvolution layer the same as a convolutional layer?cited by 16
  14. 2018A Deep Active Survival Analysis Approach for Precision Treatment Recommendations: Application of Prostate Cancercited by 12
  15. 2018Prostate Segmentation using 2D Bridged U-netcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.