The Impact of Popularity Bias on Fairness and Calibration in Recommendation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently there has been a growing interest in fairness-aware recommender systems, including fairness in providing consistent performance across different users or groups of users. A recommender system could be considered unfair if the recommendations do not fairly represent the tastes of a certain group of users while other groups receive recommendations that are consistent with their preferences. In this paper, we use a metric called miscalibration for measuring how a recommendation algorithm is responsive to users' true preferences and we consider how various algorithms may result in different degrees of miscalibration. A well-known type of bias in recommendation is popularity bias where few popular items are over-represented in recommendations, while the majority of other items do not get significant exposure. We conjecture that popularity bias is one important factor leading to miscalibration in recommendation. Our experimental results using two real-world datasets show that there is a strong correlation between how different user groups are affected by algorithmic popularity bias and their level of interest in popular items. Moreover, we show algorithms with greater popularity bias amplification tend to have greater miscalibration.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024How Do Recommendation Models Amplify Popularity Bias? An Analysis from the Spectral Perspectivecited by 21
- 2022FairSR: Fairness-aware Sequential Recommendation through Multi-Task Learning with Preference Graph Embeddingscited by 9
- 2021Quantifying Availability and Discovery in Recommender Systems via Stochastic Reachabilitycited by 8
- 2023Factual and Personalized Recommendations using Language Models and Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2023Break Out of a Pigeonhole: A Unified Framework for Examining Miscalibration, Bias, and Stereotype in Recommender Systemscited by 2
- 2025Datasets for Navigating Sensitive Topics in Recommendation Systemscited by 2
- 2023A Study on Accuracy, Miscalibration, and Popularity Bias in Recommendationscited by 0
- 2026Fair Agents: Balancing Multistakeholder Alignment in Multi-Agent Personalization Systemscited by 0
- 2026Why This, Not That? Mining User Profiles for Pair-wise Counterfactualscited by 0
- 2026Why This, Not That? Mining User Profiles for Pair-wise Counterfactuals21 Aug 2026
- 2026Fair Agents: Balancing Multistakeholder Alignment in Multi-Agent Personalization Systems4 May 2026
- 2025Datasets for Navigating Sensitive Topics in Recommendation Systems8 Sep 2025
- 2024How Do Recommendation Models Amplify Popularity Bias? An Analysis from the Spectral Perspective18 Apr 2024
- 2023Break Out of a Pigeonhole: A Unified Framework for Examining Miscalibration, Bias, and Stereotype in Recommender Systems29 Dec 2023
- 2023Factual and Personalized Recommendations using Language Models and Reinforcement Learning9 Oct 2023
- 2023A Study on Accuracy, Miscalibration, and Popularity Bias in Recommendations1 Mar 2023
- 2022FairSR: Fairness-aware Sequential Recommendation through Multi-Task Learning with Preference Graph Embeddings30 Apr 2022
- 2021Quantifying Availability and Discovery in Recommender Systems via Stochastic Reachability30 Jun 2021