mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rewiring What-to-Watch-Next Recommendations to Reduce Radicalization Pathways

arXiv 2202.00640 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2022cs.CY cs.LG cs.SIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommender systems typically suggest to users content similar to what they consumed in the past. If a user happens to be exposed to strongly polarized content, she might subsequently receive recommendations which may steer her towards more and more radicalized content, eventually being trapped in what we call a "radicalization pathway". In this paper, we study the problem of mitigating radicalization pathways using a graph-based approach. Specifically, we model the set of recommendations of a "what-to-watch-next" recommender as a d-regular directed graph where nodes correspond to content items, links to recommendations, and paths to possible user sessions. We measure the "segregation" score of a node representing radicalized content as the expected length of a random walk from that node to any node representing non-radicalized content. High segregation scores are associated to larger chances to get users trapped in radicalization pathways. Hence, we define the problem of reducing the prevalence of radicalization pathways by selecting a small number of edges to "rewire", so to minimize the maximum of segregation scores among all radicalized nodes, while maintaining the relevance of the recommendations. We prove that the problem of finding the optimal set of recommendations to rewire is NP-hard and NP-hard to approximate within any factor. Therefore, we turn our attention to heuristics, and propose an efficient yet effective greedy algorithm based on the absorbing random walk theory. Our experiments on real-world datasets in the context of video and news recommendations confirm the effectiveness of our proposal.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2022.

Builds on

21 of 60 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  2. 2017Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 334
  3. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  4. 2014The Rise of Social Botscited by 96
  5. 2021Fairness in Rankings and Recommendations: An Overviewcited by 62
  6. 2019Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTubecited by 52
  7. 2017Detecting Hate Speech in Social Mediacited by 42
  8. 2015Quantifying Controversy in Social Mediacited by 28
  9. 2019NELA-GT-2018: A Large Multi-Labelled News Dataset for The Study of Misinformation in News Articlescited by 26
  10. 2019Recommendations and User Agency: The Reachability of Collaboratively-Filtered Informationcited by 21
  11. 2021The Effect of People Recommenders on Echo Chambers and Polarizationcited by 20
  12. 2017Minimizing Polarization and Disagreement in Social Networkscited by 16
9 more
  1. 2019Disturbed YouTube for Kids: Characterizing and Detecting Inappropriate Videos Targeting Young Childrencited by 13
  2. 2019Algorithmic Extremism: Examining YouTube's Rabbit Hole of Radicalizationcited by 12
  3. 2021Exposure Inequality in People Recommender Systems: The Long-Term Effectscited by 11
  4. 2015Approximation Algorithms for Reducing the Spectral Radius to Control Epidemic Spreadcited by 8
  5. 2021Quantifying Availability and Discovery in Recommender Systems via Stochastic Reachabilitycited by 8
  6. 2021RePBubLik: Reducing the Polarized Bubble Radius with Link Insertionscited by 6
  7. 2015Absorbing random-walk centrality: Theory and algorithmscited by 3
  8. 2017Improving the betweenness centrality of a node by adding linkscited by 2
  9. 2018Coverage Centrality Maximization in Undirected Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.