mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MAML is a Noisy Contrastive Learner in Classification

arXiv 2106.15367 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) is one of the most popular and widely adopted meta-learning algorithms, achieving remarkable success in various learning problems. Yet, with the unique design of nested inner-loop and outer-loop updates, which govern the task-specific and meta-model-centric learning, respectively, the underlying learning objective of MAML remains implicit and thus impedes a more straightforward understanding of it. In this paper, we provide a new perspective of the working mechanism of MAML. We discover that MAML is analogous to a meta-learner using a supervised contrastive objective. The query features are pulled towards the support features of the same class and against those of different classes. Such contrastiveness is experimentally verified via an analysis based on the cosine similarity. Moreover, we reveal that vanilla MAML has an undesirable interference term originating from the random initialization and the cross-task interaction. We thus propose a simple but effective technique, zeroing trick, to alleviate the interference. Extensive experiments are conducted on both mini-ImageNet and Omniglot datasets to demonstrate the consistent improvement brought by our proposed method, validating its effectiveness.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2021.

Builds on

25 of 32 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  2. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  3. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  4. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  5. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  6. 2017Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learningcited by 1,139
  7. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
  8. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  9. 2019Meta-Learning with Implicit Gradientscited by 523
  10. 2019Meta-Learning with Differentiable Convex Optimizationcited by 461
  11. 2018Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solverscited by 395
  12. 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
13 more
  1. 2018How to train your MAMLcited by 306
  2. 2018Meta-Learning: A Surveycited by 254
  3. 2020Few-Shot Learning via Learning the Representation, Provablycited by 213
  4. 2019Meta-Learning Representations for Continual Learningcited by 189
  5. 2018Recasting Gradient-Based Meta-Learning as Hierarchical Bayescited by 180
  6. 2020Provable Meta-Learning of Linear Representationscited by 161
  7. 2018Task-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Few-shot Learningcited by 151
  8. 2019Meta-Learning without Memorizationcited by 92
  9. 2018ProMP: Proximal Meta-Policy Searchcited by 91
  10. 2019ES-MAML: Simple Hessian-Free Meta Learningcited by 57
  11. 2020Meta-Learning Requires Meta-Augmentationcited by 57
  12. 2020Unraveling Meta-Learning: Understanding Feature Representations for Few-Shot Taskscited by 47
  13. 2021How Fine-Tuning Allows for Effective Meta-Learningcited by 41

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

9 papers.