mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Modularity in Reinforcement Learning via Algorithmic Independence in Credit Assignment

arXiv 2106.14993 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.ITcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many transfer problems require re-using previously optimal decisions for solving new tasks, which suggests the need for learning algorithms that can modify the mechanisms for choosing certain actions independently of those for choosing others. However, there is currently no formalism nor theory for how to achieve this kind of modular credit assignment. To answer this question, we define modular credit assignment as a constraint on minimizing the algorithmic mutual information among feedback signals for different decisions. We introduce what we call the modularity criterion for testing whether a learning algorithm satisfies this constraint by performing causal analysis on the algorithm itself. We generalize the recently proposed societal decision-making framework as a more granular formalism than the Markov decision process to prove that for decision sequences that do not contain cycles, certain single-step temporal difference action-value methods meet this criterion while all policy-gradient methods do not. Empirical evidence suggests that such action-value methods are more sample efficient than policy-gradient methods on transfer problems that require only sparse changes to a sequence of previously optimal decisions.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2021.

Builds on

25 of 60 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  5. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  6. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 375
  7. 2019Recurrent Independent Mechanismscited by 219
  8. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning and the Deadly Triadcited by 170
  9. 2020Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 134
  10. 2016Learning Modular Neural Network Policies for Multi-Task and Multi-Robot Transfercited by 124
  11. 2020Are Neural Nets Modular? Inspecting Functional Modularity Through Differentiable Weight Maskscited by 97
  12. 2019Diagnosing Bottlenecks in Deep Q-learning Algorithmscited by 73
13 more
  1. 2019Learning to Control Self-Assembling Morphologies: A Study of Generalization via Modularitycited by 68
  2. 2018An Introduction to Probabilistic Programmingcited by 62
  3. 2018Modular Networks: Learning to Decompose Neural Computationcited by 62
  4. 2018Modular meta-learningcited by 51
  5. 2013Strong Completeness and Faithfulness in Bayesian Networkscited by 44
  6. 2019Towards Characterizing Divergence in Deep Q-Learningcited by 43
  7. 2018Automatically Composing Representation Transformations as a Means for Generalizationcited by 35
  8. 2021Clusterability in Neural Networkscited by 23
  9. 2020D3C: Reducing the Price of Anarchy in Multi-Agent Learningcited by 16
  10. 2020Decentralized Reinforcement Learning: Global Decision-Making via Local Economic Transactionscited by 14
  11. 2018Interpreting Layered Neural Networks via Hierarchical Modular Representationcited by 11
  12. 2020Smooth markets: A basic mechanism for organizing gradient-based learnerscited by 4
  13. 2014Cortical prediction marketscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

6 papers.