mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-training Converts Weak Learners to Strong Learners in Mixture Models

arXiv 2106.13805 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2021cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a binary classification problem when the data comes from a mixture of two rotationally symmetric distributions satisfying concentration and anti-concentration properties enjoyed by log-concave distributions among others. We show that there exists a universal constant Cerr>0 such that if a pseudolabeler boldsymbolβpl can achieve classification error at most Cerr, then for any varepsilon>0, an iterative self-training algorithm initialized at boldsymbolβ0 := boldsymbolβpl using pseudolabels hat y = sgn(langle boldsymbolβt, xrangle) and using at most tilde O(d/varepsilon2) unlabeled examples suffices to learn the Bayes-optimal classifier up to varepsilon error, where d is the ambient dimension. That is, self-training converts weak learners to strong learners using only unlabeled examples. We additionally show that by running gradient descent on the logistic loss one can obtain a pseudolabeler boldsymbolβpl with classification error Cerr using only O(d) labeled examples (i.e., independent of varepsilon). Together our results imply that mixture models can be learned to within varepsilon of the Bayes-optimal accuracy using at most O(d) labeled examples and tilde O(d/varepsilon2) unlabeled examples by way of a semi-supervised self-training algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2021.

Builds on

23 of 37 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2019Confidence Regularized Self-Trainingcited by 418
  5. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 372
  6. 2021In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 301
  7. 2020Theoretical Analysis of Self-Training with Deep Networks on Unlabeled Datacited by 179
  8. 2020Predicting What You Already Know Helps: Provable Self-Supervised Learningcited by 152
  9. 2020Understanding Self-Training for Gradual Domain Adaptationcited by 149
  10. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
  11. 2020Contrastive learning, multi-view redundancy, and linear modelscited by 146
  12. 2020Self-training Avoids Using Spurious Features Under Domain Shiftcited by 69
11 more
  1. 2019Distribution-Independent PAC Learning of Halfspaces with Massart Noisecited by 54
  2. 2020In-N-Out: Pre-Training and Self-Training using Auxiliary Information for Out-of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 49
  3. 2021A Theory of Label Propagation for Subpopulation Shiftcited by 48
  4. 2020Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise Under Structured Distributionscited by 45
  5. 2021Generalization bounds via distillationcited by 33
  6. 2020Non-Convex SGD Learns Halfspaces with Adversarial Label Noisecited by 30
  7. 2021Provable Generalization of SGD-trained Neural Networks of Any Width in the Presence of Adversarial Label Noisecited by 17
  8. 2019When can unlabeled data improve the learning rate?cited by 14
  9. 2020Agnostic Learning of Halfspaces with Gradient Descent via Soft Marginscited by 14
  10. 2020Statistical and Algorithmic Insights for Semi-supervised Learning with Self-trainingcited by 11
  11. 2021Provable Robustness of Adversarial Training for Learning Halfspaces with Noisecited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 6; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  2. 2024Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanismcited by 102
  3. 2022Self-Training: A Surveycited by 85
  4. 2024Theoretical Analysis of Weak-to-Strong Generalizationcited by 46
  5. 2024High-dimensional Analysis of Knowledge Distillation: Weak-to-Strong Generalization and Scaling Lawscited by 21
  6. 2022Knowledge Distillation: Bad Models Can Be Good Role Modelscited by 12
  7. 2024Rethinking Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-Trainingcited by 10
  8. 2025Discrepancies are Virtue: Weak-to-Strong Generalization through Lens of Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 10
  9. 2023Learning with Explanation Constraintscited by 8
  10. 2025Theoretical Modeling of Large Language Model Self-Improvement Training Dynamics Through Solver-Verifier Gapcited by 6
  11. 2023Can semi-supervised learning use all the data effectively? A lower bound perspectivecited by 5
  12. 2025Prediction-Powered Semi-Supervised Learning with Online Power Tuningcited by 5
7 more
  1. 2025Evaluating multiple models using labeled and unlabeled datacited by 4
  2. 2022Margin-based sampling in high dimensions: When being active is less efficient than staying passivecited by 3
  3. 2024BANGS: Game-Theoretic Node Selection for Graph Self-Trainingcited by 2
  4. 2022On PAC Learning Halfspaces in Non-interactive Local Privacy Model with Public Unlabeled Datacited by 1
  5. 2025Mitigating Negative Transfer via Reducing Environmental Disagreementcited by 1
  6. 2026Why Self-Training Helps and Hurts: Denoising vs. Signal Forgettingcited by 0
  7. 2026MAST: Label-Efficient, Robust, and Generalizable Sound Detection for Biodiversity Monitoring via Masked Audio Pretraining and Self-Trainingcited by 0