mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Differentially Private Online Predictions

arXiv 2302.14099 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2023cs.LG cs.CR cs.DScited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work we introduce an interactive variant of joint differential privacy towards handling online processes in which existing privacy definitions seem too restrictive. We study basic properties of this definition and demonstrate that it satisfies (suitable variants) of group privacy, composition, and post processing. We then study the cost of interactive joint privacy in the basic setting of online classification. We show that any (possibly non-private) learning rule can be effectively transformed to a private learning rule with only a polynomial overhead in the mistake bound. This demonstrates a stark difference with more restrictive notions of privacy such as the one studied by Golowich and Livni (2021), where only a double exponential overhead on the mistake bound is known (via an information theoretic upper bound).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2023.

Builds on

8 of 23 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018Differentially Private Contextual Linear Banditscited by 82
  2. 2017The Price of Differential Privacy For Online Learningcited by 44
  3. 2021The Price of Differential Privacy under Continual Observationcited by 32
  4. 2016Make Up Your Mind: The Price of Online Queries in Differential Privacycited by 26
  5. 2022Private Online Prediction from Experts: Separations and Faster Ratescited by 17
  6. 2021Littlestone Classes are Privately Online Learnablecited by 10
  7. 2020The Sparse Vector Technique, Revisitedcited by 8
  8. 2015Robust Mediators in Large Gamescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.

3 papers.