mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Biologically Plausible Convolutional Networks

arXiv 2106.13031 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.NE q-bio.NCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional networks are ubiquitous in deep learning. They are particularly useful for images, as they reduce the number of parameters, reduce training time, and increase accuracy. However, as a model of the brain they are seriously problematic, since they require weight sharing - something real neurons simply cannot do. Consequently, while neurons in the brain can be locally connected (one of the features of convolutional networks), they cannot be convolutional. Locally connected but non-convolutional networks, however, significantly underperform convolutional ones. This is troublesome for studies that use convolutional networks to explain activity in the visual system. Here we study plausible alternatives to weight sharing that aim at the same regularization principle, which is to make each neuron within a pool react similarly to identical inputs. The most natural way to do that is by showing the network multiple translations of the same image, akin to saccades in animal vision. However, this approach requires many translations, and doesn't remove the performance gap. We propose instead to add lateral connectivity to a locally connected network, and allow learning via Hebbian plasticity. This requires the network to pause occasionally for a sleep-like phase of "weight sharing". This method enables locally connected networks to achieve nearly convolutional performance on ImageNet and improves their fit to the ventral stream data, thus supporting convolutional networks as a model of the visual stream.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2021.

Builds on

26 of 71 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  6. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  7. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  8. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  9. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  10. 2021Pay Attention to MLPscited by 367
  11. 2021ResMLP: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient trainingcited by 338
  12. 2016Direct Feedback Alignment Provides Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 240
14 more
  1. 2019SGD: General Analysis and Improved Ratescited by 206
  2. 2017LSTM Fully Convolutional Networks for Time Series Classificationcited by 135
  3. 2019Training Neural Networks with Local Error Signalscited by 135
  4. 2018Assessing the Scalability of Biologically-Motivated Deep Learning Algorithms and Architecturescited by 100
  5. 2019Deep Learning without Weight Transportcited by 87
  6. 2020Convolutional Neural Networks as a Model of the Visual System: Past, Present, and Futurecited by 83
  7. 2020Scaling Equilibrium Propagation to Deep ConvNets by Drastically Reducing its Gradient Estimator Biascited by 60
  8. 2020Towards Learning Convolutions from Scratchcited by 46
  9. 2017Deep supervised learning using local errorscited by 41
  10. 2018Feedback alignment in deep convolutional networkscited by 31
  11. 2020Revisiting Spatial Invariance with Low-Rank Local Connectivitycited by 29
  12. 2020Kernelized information bottleneck leads to biologically plausible 3-factor Hebbian learning in deep networkscited by 25
  13. 2019Finding the Needle in the Haystack with Convolutions: on the benefits of architectural biascited by 19
  14. 2019Learning in the Machine: To Share or Not to Share?cited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort: