mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning in the Machine: To Share or Not to Share?

arXiv 1909.11483 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2019cs.LG cs.NE q-bio.NCcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Weight-sharing is one of the pillars behind Convolutional Neural Networks and their successes. However, in physical neural systems such as the brain, weight-sharing is implausible. This discrepancy raises the fundamental question of whether weight-sharing is necessary. If so, to which degree of precision? If not, what are the alternatives? The goal of this study is to investigate these questions, primarily through simulations where the weight-sharing assumption is relaxed. Taking inspiration from neural circuitry, we explore the use of Free Convolutional Networks and neurons with variable connection patterns. Using Free Convolutional Networks, we show that while weight-sharing is a pragmatic optimization approach, it is not a necessity in computer vision applications. Furthermore, Free Convolutional Networks match the performance observed in standard architectures when trained using properly translated data (akin to video). Under the assumption of translationally augmented data, Free Convolutional Networks learn translationally invariant representations that yield an approximate form of weight sharing.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

9 papers.