mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Information Bottleneck-Based Hebbian Learning Rule Naturally Ties Working Memory and Synaptic Updates

arXiv 2111.13187 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2021cs.NE cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial neural networks have successfully tackled a large variety of problems by training extremely deep networks via back-propagation. A direct application of back-propagation to spiking neural networks contains biologically implausible components, like the weight transport problem or separate inference and learning phases. Various methods address different components individually, but a complete solution remains intangible. Here, we take an alternate approach that avoids back-propagation and its associated issues entirely. Recent work in deep learning proposed independently training each layer of a network via the information bottleneck (IB). Subsequent studies noted that this layer-wise approach circumvents error propagation across layers, leading to a biologically plausible paradigm. Unfortunately, the IB is computed using a batch of samples. The prior work addresses this with a weight update that only uses two samples (the current and previous sample). Our work takes a different approach by decomposing the weight update into a local and global component. The local component is Hebbian and only depends on the current sample. The global component computes a layer-wise modulatory signal that depends on a batch of samples. We show that this modulatory signal can be learned by an auxiliary circuit with working memory (WM) like a reservoir. Thus, we can use batch sizes greater than two, and the batch size determines the required capacity of the WM. To the best of our knowledge, our rule is the first biologically plausible mechanism to directly couple synaptic updates with a WM of the task. We evaluate our rule on synthetic datasets and image classification datasets like MNIST, and we explore the effect of the WM capacity on learning performance. We hope our work is a first-step towards understanding the mechanistic role of memory in learning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2021.

Builds on

13 of 40 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  2. 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 604
  3. 2016Equilibrium Propagation: Bridging the Gap Between Energy-Based Models and Backpropagationcited by 251
  4. 2019Training Neural Networks with Local Error Signalscited by 135
  5. 2018Greedy Layerwise Learning Can Scale to ImageNetcited by 113
  6. 2019Deep Learning without Weight Transportcited by 87
  7. 2019The HSIC Bottleneck: Deep Learning without Back-Propagationcited by 77
  8. 2015How Important is Weight Symmetry in Backpropagation?cited by 57
  9. 2014Random feedback weights support learning in deep neural networkscited by 47
  10. 2020Kernelized information bottleneck leads to biologically plausible 3-factor Hebbian learning in deep networkscited by 25
  11. 2020GAIT-prop: A biologically plausible learning rule derived from backpropagation of errorcited by 15
  12. 2021Towards Biologically Plausible Convolutional Networkscited by 13
1 more
  1. 2014Kickback cuts Backprop's red-tape: Biologically plausible credit assignment in neural networkscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.