mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SENT: Sentence-level Distant Relation Extraction via Negative Training

arXiv 2106.11566 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2021cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Distant supervision for relation extraction provides uniform bag labels for each sentence inside the bag, while accurate sentence labels are important for downstream applications that need the exact relation type. Directly using bag labels for sentence-level training will introduce much noise, thus severely degrading performance. In this work, we propose the use of negative training (NT), in which a model is trained using complementary labels regarding that ``the instance does not belong to these complementary labels". Since the probability of selecting a true label as a complementary label is low, NT provides less noisy information. Furthermore, the model trained with NT is able to separate the noisy data from the training data. Based on NT, we propose a sentence-level framework, SENT, for distant relation extraction. SENT not only filters the noisy data to construct a cleaner dataset, but also performs a re-labeling process to transform the noisy data into useful training data, thus further benefiting the model's performance. Experimental results show the significant improvement of the proposed method over previous methods on sentence-level evaluation and de-noise effect.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2021.

Builds on

29 of 60 references.

References · 29

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  3. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  4. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  5. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  6. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  7. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  8. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  9. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  10. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  11. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  12. 2019Long-tail Relation Extraction via Knowledge Graph Embeddings and Graph Convolution Networkscited by 61
17 more
  1. 2018RESIDE: Improving Distantly-Supervised Neural Relation Extraction using Side Informationcited by 47
  2. 2018Reinforcement Learning for Relation Classification from Noisy Datacited by 46
  3. 2016Question Answering on Freebase via Relation Extraction and Textual Evidencecited by 39
  4. 2019Fine-tuning Pre-Trained Transformer Language Models to Distantly Supervised Relation Extractioncited by 36
  5. 2018Robust Distant Supervision Relation Extraction via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  6. 2019Distant Supervision Relation Extraction with Intra-Bag and Inter-Bag Attentionscited by 27
  7. 2019Self-Attention Enhanced Selective Gate with Entity-Aware Embedding for Distantly Supervised Relation Extractioncited by 18
  8. 2017Learning with Noise: Enhance Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction with Dynamic Transition Matrixcited by 14
  9. 2015Multilingual Relation Extraction using Compositional Universal Schemacited by 11
  10. 2019Are Noisy Sentences Useless for Distant Supervised Relation Extraction?cited by 10
  11. 2018Cross-relation Cross-bag Attention for Distantly-supervised Relation Extractioncited by 9
  12. 2018Combining Distant and Direct Supervision for Neural Relation Extractioncited by 6
  13. 2018Distant Supervision for Relation Extraction with Linear Attenuation Simulation and Non-IID Relevance Embeddingcited by 5
  14. 2019Structured Minimally Supervised Learning for Neural Relation Extractioncited by 4
  15. 2019Leveraging 2-hop Distant Supervision from Table Entity Pairs for Relation Extractioncited by 3
  16. 2018Denoising Distant Supervision for Relation Extraction via Instance-Level Adversarial Trainingcited by 2
  17. 2019Uncover the Ground-Truth Relations in Distant Supervision: A Neural Expectation-Maximization Frameworkcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 5; 2024: 1.

10 papers.