Open Set Relation Extraction via Unknown-Aware Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The existing supervised relation extraction methods have achieved impressive performance in a closed-set setting, where the relations during both training and testing remain the same. In a more realistic open-set setting, unknown relations may appear in the test set. Due to the lack of supervision signals from unknown relations, a well-performing closed-set relation extractor can still confidently misclassify them into known relations. In this paper, we propose an unknown-aware training method, regularizing the model by dynamically synthesizing negative instances. To facilitate a compact decision boundary, ``difficult'' negative instances are necessary. Inspired by text adversarial attacks, we adaptively apply small but critical perturbations to original training instances and thus synthesizing negative instances that are more likely to be mistaken by the model as known relations. Experimental results show that this method achieves SOTA unknown relation detection without compromising the classification of known relations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2023.
Builds on
29 of 47 references.
References · 29
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2019An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Predictioncited by 386
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 305
- 2019Matching the Blanks: Distributional Similarity for Relation Learningcited by 272
- 2018FewRel: A Large-Scale Supervised Few-Shot Relation Classification Dataset with State-of-the-Art Evaluationcited by 254
- 2018Graph Convolution over Pruned Dependency Trees Improves Relation Extractioncited by 146
- 2018Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretations Difficultcited by 140
17 more
- 2017DOC: Deep Open Classification of Text Documentscited by 109
- 2019FewRel 2.0: Towards More Challenging Few-Shot Relation Classificationcited by 94
- 2019Enriching Pre-trained Language Model with Entity Information for Relation Classificationcited by 82
- 2018Mem2Seq: Effectively Incorporating Knowledge Bases into End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialog Systemscited by 70
- 2019Deep Unknown Intent Detection with Margin Losscited by 66
- 2019Out-of-domain Detection for Natural Language Understanding in Dialog Systemscited by 62
- 2020Deep Open Intent Classification with Adaptive Decision Boundarycited by 56
- 2020More Data, More Relations, More Context and More Openness: A Review and Outlook for Relation Extractioncited by 52
- 2020SelfORE: Self-supervised Relational Feature Learning for Open Relation Extractioncited by 43
- 2021Modeling Discriminative Representations for Out-of-Domain Detection with Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 42
- 2021Out-of-Scope Intent Detection with Self-Supervision and Discriminative Trainingcited by 42
- 2019Span Model for Open Information Extraction on Accurate Corpuscited by 33
- 2019Graph Neural Networks with Generated Parameters for Relation Extractioncited by 27
- 2019Interpreting and Evaluating Neural Network Robustnesscited by 19
- 2021A Relation-Oriented Clustering Method for Open Relation Extractioncited by 15
- 2018Unsupervised Open Relation Extractioncited by 14
- 2021SENT: Sentence-level Distant Relation Extraction via Negative Trainingcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.