mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analysis and Optimisation of Bellman Residual Errors with Neural Function Approximation

arXiv 2106.08774 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2021cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent development of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has demonstrated superior performance of neural networks in solving challenging problems with large or even continuous state spaces. One specific approach is to deploy neural networks to approximate value functions by minimising the Mean Squared Bellman Error (MSBE) function. Despite great successes of DRL, development of reliable and efficient numerical algorithms to minimise the MSBE is still of great scientific interest and practical demand. Such a challenge is partially due to the underlying optimisation problem being highly non-convex or using incomplete gradient information as done in Semi-Gradient algorithms. In this work, we analyse the MSBE from a smooth optimisation perspective and develop an efficient Approximate Newton's algorithm. First, we conduct a critical point analysis of the error function and provide technical insights on optimisation and design choices for neural networks. When the existence of global minima is assumed and the objective fulfils certain conditions, suboptimal local minima can be avoided when using over-parametrised neural networks. We construct a Gauss Newton Residual Gradient algorithm based on the analysis in two variations. The first variation applies to discrete state spaces and exact learning. We confirm theoretical properties of this algorithm such as being locally quadratically convergent to a global minimum numerically. The second employs sampling and can be used in the continuous setting. We demonstrate feasibility and generalisation capabilities of the proposed algorithm empirically using continuous control problems and provide a numerical verification of our critical point analysis. We outline the difficulties of combining Semi-Gradient approaches with Hessian information. To benefit from second-order information complete derivatives of the MSBE must be considered during training.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2021.

Builds on

15 of 54 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
  4. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  5. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  6. 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 600
  7. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 234
  8. 2017The loss surface of deep and wide neural networkscited by 74
  9. 2019Diagnosing Bottlenecks in Deep Q-learning Algorithmscited by 73
  10. 2019Neural Proximal/Trust Region Policy Optimization Attains Globally Optimal Policycited by 43
  11. 2017Global optimality conditions for deep neural networkscited by 31
  12. 2019Deep Residual Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
3 more
  1. 2019Geometric Insights into the Convergence of Nonlinear TD Learningcited by 13
  2. 2018Policy Search in Continuous Action Domains: an Overviewcited by 10
  3. 2018A Differential Topological View of Challenges in Learning with Feedforward Neural Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.