mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sparse and Imperceptible Adversarial Attack via a Homotopy Algorithm

arXiv 2106.06027 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse adversarial attacks can fool deep neural networks (DNNs) by only perturbing a few pixels (regularized by l_0 norm). Recent efforts combine it with another l_infty imperceptible on the perturbation magnitudes. The resultant sparse and imperceptible attacks are practically relevant, and indicate an even higher vulnerability of DNNs that we usually imagined. However, such attacks are more challenging to generate due to the optimization difficulty by coupling the l_0 regularizer and box constraints with a non-convex objective. In this paper, we address this challenge by proposing a homotopy algorithm, to jointly tackle the sparsity and the perturbation bound in one unified framework. Each iteration, the main step of our algorithm is to optimize an l_0-regularized adversarial loss, by leveraging the nonmonotone Accelerated Proximal Gradient Method (nmAPG) for nonconvex programming; it is followed by an l_0 change control step, and an optional post-attack step designed to escape bad local minima. We also extend the algorithm to handling the structural sparsity regularizer. We extensively examine the effectiveness of our proposed homotopy attack for both targeted and non-targeted attack scenarios, on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, our homotopy attack leads to significantly fewer perturbations, e.g., reducing 42.91% on CIFAR-10 and 75.03% on ImageNet (average case, targeted attack), at similar maximal perturbation magnitudes, when still achieving 100% attack success rates. Our codes are available at: https://github.com/VITA-Group/SparseADV_Homotopy.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2021.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  5. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  6. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
  7. 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 579
  8. 2018Generating Adversarial Examples with Adversarial Networkscited by 256
  9. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  10. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  11. 2018Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNISTcited by 104
  12. 2019Sparse and Imperceivable Adversarial Attackscited by 95
7 more
  1. 2018SparseFool: a few pixels make a big differencecited by 94
  2. 2018Structured Adversarial Attack: Towards General Implementation and Better Interpretabilitycited by 63
  3. 2020LG-GAN: Label Guided Adversarial Network for Flexible Targeted Attack of Point Cloud-based Deep Networkscited by 55
  4. 2020GreedyFool: Distortion-Aware Sparse Adversarial Attackcited by 37
  5. 2018A Survey on Nonconvex Regularization Based Sparse and Low-Rank Recovery in Signal Processing, Statistics, and Machine Learningcited by 20
  6. 2021Learning Diverse-Structured Networks for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 12
  7. 2016Structured Sparse Regression via Greedy Hard-Thresholdingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 6; 2025: 3.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: