A Versatile Framework for Designing Group-Sparse Adversarial Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing adversarial attacks often neglect perturbation sparsity, limiting their ability to model structural changes and to explain how deep neural networks (DNNs) process meaningful input patterns. We propose ATOS (Attack Through Overlapping Sparsity), a differentiable optimization framework that generates structured, sparse adversarial perturbations in element-wise, pixel-wise, and group-wise forms. For white-box attacks on image classifiers, we introduce the Overlapping Smoothed L0 (OSL0) function, which promotes convergence to a stationary point while encouraging sparse, structured perturbations. By grouping channels and adjacent pixels, ATOS improves interpretability and helps identify robust versus non-robust features. We approximate the L-infinity gradient using the logarithm of the sum of exponential absolute values to tightly control perturbation magnitude. On CIFAR-10 and ImageNet, ATOS achieves a 100% attack success rate while producing significantly sparser and more structurally coherent perturbations than prior methods. The structured group-wise attack highlights critical regions from the network's perspective, providing counterfactual explanations by replacing class-defining regions with robust features from the target class.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2025.
Builds on
29 of 51 references.
References · 29
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 579
17 more
- 2019Deep Learning for Image Super-resolution: A Surveycited by 368
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 312
- 2019Sparse and Imperceivable Adversarial Attackscited by 95
- 2018SparseFool: a few pixels make a big differencecited by 94
- 2022Three things everyone should know about Vision Transformerscited by 90
- 2023A Comprehensive Study on Robustness of Image Classification Models: Benchmarking and Rethinkingcited by 85
- 2024Diffusion Models in Low-Level Vision: A Surveycited by 73
- 2018Structured Adversarial Attack: Towards General Implementation and Better Interpretabilitycited by 63
- 2018Adversarial Examples: Opportunities and Challengescited by 62
- 2020GreedyFool: Distortion-Aware Sparse Adversarial Attackcited by 37
- 2019Adversarial Attack on Skeleton-based Human Action Recognitioncited by 32
- 2014A globally convergent algorithm for nonconvex optimization based on block coordinate updatecited by 29
- 2024Adversarial Attacks of Vision Tasks in the Past 10 Years: A Surveycited by 22
- 2024MeanSparse: Post-Training Robustness Enhancement Through Mean-Centered Feature Sparsificationcited by 20
- 2023Adversarial Examples Are Not Real Featurescited by 16
- 2021Sparse and Imperceptible Adversarial Attack via a Homotopy Algorithmcited by 15
- 2023GSE: Group-wise Sparse and Explainable Adversarial Attackscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.