mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

S-CFE: Simple Counterfactual Explanations

arXiv 2410.15723 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2024cs.LG math.OCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of finding optimal sparse, manifold-aligned counterfactual explanations for classifiers. Canonically, this can be formulated as an optimization problem with multiple non-convex components, including classifier loss functions and manifold alignment (or plausibility) metrics. The added complexity of enforcing sparsity, or shorter explanations, complicates the problem further. Existing methods often focus on specific models and plausibility measures, relying on convex ℓ1 regularizers to enforce sparsity. In this paper, we tackle the canonical formulation using the accelerated proximal gradient (APG) method, a simple yet efficient first-order procedure capable of handling smooth non-convex objectives and non-smooth ℓp (where 0 ≤ p < 1) regularizers. This enables our approach to seamlessly incorporate various classifiers and plausibility measures while producing sparser solutions. Our algorithm only requires differentiable data-manifold regularizers and supports box constraints for bounded feature ranges, ensuring the generated counterfactuals remain actionable. Finally, experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach effectively produces sparse, manifold-aligned counterfactual explanations while maintaining proximity to the factual data and computational efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2024.

Builds on

23 of 53 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,223
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,111
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,992
  5. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,088
  6. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
  7. 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 529
  8. 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 262
  9. 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
  10. 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
  11. 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
  12. 2021Counterfactual Explanations Can Be Manipulatedcited by 113
11 more
  1. 2019Sparse and Imperceivable Adversarial Attackscited by 95
  2. 2023Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks With Probabilistic Guaranteescited by 45
  3. 2020Decisions, Counterfactual Explanations and Strategic Behaviorcited by 44
  4. 2021Evaluating Robustness of Counterfactual Explanationscited by 41
  5. 2020Convex Density Constraints for Computing Plausible Counterfactual Explanationscited by 32
  6. 2019Towards Robust, Locally Linear Deep Networkscited by 20
  7. 2022Improvement-Focused Causal Recourse (ICR)cited by 20
  8. 2021Consequence-aware Sequential Counterfactual Generationcited by 17
  9. 2021Sparse and Imperceptible Adversarial Attack via a Homotopy Algorithmcited by 15
  10. 2023GSE: Group-wise Sparse and Explainable Adversarial Attackscited by 6
  11. 2024CountARFactuals -- Generating plausible model-agnostic counterfactual explanations with adversarial random forestscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.