Weak Supervision helps Emergence of Word-Object Alignment and improves Vision-Language Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The large adoption of the self-attention (i.e. transformer model) and BERT-like training principles has recently resulted in a number of high performing models on a large panoply of vision-and-language problems (such as Visual Question Answering (VQA), image retrieval, etc.). In this paper we claim that these State-Of-The-Art (SOTA) approaches perform reasonably well in structuring information inside a single modality but, despite their impressive performances , they tend to struggle to identify fine-grained inter-modality relationships. Indeed, such relations are frequently assumed to be implicitly learned during training from application-specific losses, mostly cross-entropy for classification. While most recent works provide inductive bias for inter-modality relationships via cross attention modules, in this work, we demonstrate (1) that the latter assumption does not hold, i.e. modality alignment does not necessarily emerge automatically, and (2) that adding weak supervision for alignment between visual objects and words improves the quality of the learned models on tasks requiring reasoning. In particular , we integrate an object-word alignment loss into SOTA vision-language reasoning models and evaluate it on two tasks VQA and Language-driven Comparison of Images. We show that the proposed fine-grained inter-modality supervision significantly improves performance on both tasks. In particular, this new learning signal allows obtaining SOTA-level performances on GQA dataset (VQA task) with pre-trained models without finetuning on the task, and a new SOTA on NLVR2 dataset (Language-driven Comparison of Images). Finally, we also illustrate the impact of the contribution on the models reasoning by visualizing attention distributions.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.
9 papers.
- 2021VisQA: X-raying Vision and Language Reasoning in Transformerscited by 19
- 2021How Transferable are Reasoning Patterns in VQA?cited by 16
- 2021Perspectives and Prospects on Transformer Architecture for Cross-Modal Tasks with Language and Visioncited by 14
- 2021Weakly Supervised Relative Spatial Reasoning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 12
- 2024RG-SAN: Rule-Guided Spatial Awareness Network for End-to-End 3D Referring Expression Segmentationcited by 11
- 2021Supervising the Transfer of Reasoning Patterns in VQAcited by 7
- 2022An experimental study of the vision-bottleneck in VQAcited by 1
- 2024What do MLLMs hear? Examining reasoning with text and sound components in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2022That's the Wrong Lung! Evaluating and Improving the Interpretability of Unsupervised Multimodal Encoders for Medical Datacited by 0
- 2024RG-SAN: Rule-Guided Spatial Awareness Network for End-to-End 3D Referring Expression Segmentation3 Dec 2024
- 2024What do MLLMs hear? Examining reasoning with text and sound components in Multimodal Large Language Models7 Jun 2024
- 2022That's the Wrong Lung! Evaluating and Improving the Interpretability of Unsupervised Multimodal Encoders for Medical Data12 Oct 2022
- 2022An experimental study of the vision-bottleneck in VQA14 Feb 2022
- 2021Weakly Supervised Relative Spatial Reasoning for Visual Question Answering4 Sep 2021
- 2021Supervising the Transfer of Reasoning Patterns in VQA10 Jun 2021
- 2021How Transferable are Reasoning Patterns in VQA?8 Apr 2021
- 2021VisQA: X-raying Vision and Language Reasoning in Transformers2 Apr 2021
- 2021Perspectives and Prospects on Transformer Architecture for Cross-Modal Tasks with Language and Vision6 Mar 2021