An experimental study of the vision-bottleneck in VQA
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As in many tasks combining vision and language, both modalities play a crucial role in Visual Question Answering (VQA). To properly solve the task, a given model should both understand the content of the proposed image and the nature of the question. While the fusion between modalities, which is another obviously important part of the problem, has been highly studied, the vision part has received less attention in recent work. Current state-of-the-art methods for VQA mainly rely on off-the-shelf object detectors delivering a set of object bounding boxes and embeddings, which are then combined with question word embeddings through a reasoning module. In this paper, we propose an in-depth study of the vision-bottleneck in VQA, experimenting with both the quantity and quality of visual objects extracted from images. We also study the impact of two methods to incorporate the information about objects necessary for answering a question, in the reasoning module directly, and earlier in the object selection stage. This work highlights the importance of vision in the context of VQA, and the interest of tailoring vision methods used in VQA to the task at hand.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2022.
Builds on
41 of 48 references.
References · 41
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
29 more
- 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,553
- 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,431
- 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
- 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
- 2021MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understandingcited by 819
- 2019Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 429
- 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
- 2019Deep Modular Co-Attention Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
- 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
- 2018Bilinear Attention Networkscited by 280
- 2016Hierarchical Question-Image Co-Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 278
- 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
- 2020In Defense of Grid Features for Visual Question Answeringcited by 155
- 2017MUTAN: Multimodal Tucker Fusion for Visual Question Answeringcited by 137
- 2019Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Groundedcited by 128
- 2019Learning by Abstraction: The Neural State Machinecited by 113
- 2016Human Attention in Visual Question Answering: Do Humans and Deep Networks Look at the Same Regions?cited by 111
- 2017Tips and Tricks for Visual Question Answering: Learnings from the 2017 Challengecited by 76
- 2020Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?cited by 69
- 2019BLOCK: Bilinear Superdiagonal Fusion for Visual Question Answering and Visual Relationship Detectioncited by 62
- 2017VQS: Linking Segmentations to Questions and Answers for Supervised Attention in VQA and Question-Focused Semantic Segmentationcited by 50
- 2017Exploring Human-like Attention Supervision in Visual Question Answeringcited by 36
- 2018Interpretable Visual Question Answering by Visual Grounding from Attention Supervision Miningcited by 28
- 2021How Transferable are Reasoning Patterns in VQA?cited by 16
- 2019Weak Supervision helps Emergence of Word-Object Alignment and improves Vision-Language Taskscited by 9
- 2021Supervising the Transfer of Reasoning Patterns in VQAcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.