mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust Transferable Feature Extractors: Learning to Defend Pre-Trained Networks Against White Box Adversaries

arXiv 2209.06931 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread adoption of deep neural networks in computer vision applications has brought forth a significant interest in adversarial robustness. Existing research has shown that maliciously perturbed inputs specifically tailored for a given model (i.e., adversarial examples) can be successfully transferred to another independently trained model to induce prediction errors. Moreover, this property of adversarial examples has been attributed to features derived from predictive patterns in the data distribution. Thus, we are motivated to investigate the following question: Can adversarial defenses, like adversarial examples, be successfully transferred to other independently trained models? To this end, we propose a deep learning-based pre-processing mechanism, which we refer to as a robust transferable feature extractor (RTFE). After examining theoretical motivation and implications, we experimentally show that our method can provide adversarial robustness to multiple independently pre-trained classifiers that are otherwise ineffective against an adaptive white box adversary. Furthermore, we show that RTFEs can even provide one-shot adversarial robustness to models independently trained on different datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2022.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  5. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  6. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  7. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  8. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  9. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  10. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 520
  11. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 447
  12. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
6 more
  1. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 316
  2. 2018Is Robustness the Cost of Accuracy? -- A Comprehensive Study on the Robustness of 18 Deep Image Classification Modelscited by 135
  3. 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 132
  4. 2018On the Robustness of the CVPR 2018 White-Box Adversarial Example Defensescited by 40
  5. 2021Improving White-box Robustness of Pre-processing Defenses via Joint Adversarial Trainingcited by 3
  6. 2022Defense against Adversarial Attacks on Hybrid Speech Recognition using Joint Adversarial Fine-tuning with Denoisercited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.