Crosslingual Embeddings are Essential in UNMT for Distant Languages: An English to IndoAryan Case Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation (UNMT) have minimized the gap between supervised and unsupervised machine translation performance for closely related language pairs. However, the situation is very different for distant language pairs. Lack of lexical overlap and low syntactic similarities such as between English and Indo-Aryan languages leads to poor translation quality in existing UNMT systems. In this paper, we show that initializing the embedding layer of UNMT models with cross-lingual embeddings shows significant improvements in BLEU score over existing approaches with embeddings randomly initialized. Further, static embeddings (freezing the embedding layer weights) lead to better gains compared to updating the embedding layer weights during training (non-static). We experimented using Masked Sequence to Sequence (MASS) and Denoising Autoencoder (DAE) UNMT approaches for three distant language pairs. The proposed cross-lingual embedding initialization yields BLEU score improvement of as much as ten times over the baseline for English-Hindi, English-Bengali, and English-Gujarati. Our analysis shows the importance of cross-lingual embedding, comparisons between approaches, and the scope of improvements in these systems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2021.
Builds on
23 of 32 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
- 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,088
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
- 2019How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?cited by 642
- 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
- 2019MASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language Generationcited by 345
- 2017Unsupervised Machine Translation Using Monolingual Corpora Onlycited by 272
- 2019Emerging Cross-lingual Structure in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 180
11 more
- 2017Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 148
- 2018A robust self-learning method for fully unsupervised cross-lingual mappings of word embeddingscited by 145
- 2018Unsupervised Statistical Machine Translationcited by 51
- 2020AI4Bharat-IndicNLP Corpus: Monolingual Corpora and Word Embeddings for Indic Languagescited by 43
- 2020When Does Unsupervised Machine Translation Work?cited by 38
- 2020When and Why is Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation Useless?cited by 34
- 2019Cross-lingual Alignment vs Joint Training: A Comparative Study and A Simple Unified Frameworkcited by 26
- 2020Cross-lingual Alignment Methods for Multilingual BERT: A Comparative Studycited by 24
- 2020Reusing a Pretrained Language Model on Languages with Limited Corpora for Unsupervised NMTcited by 18
- 2018Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation with Weight Sharingcited by 15
- 2021Improving the Lexical Ability of Pretrained Language Models for Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
3 papers.