Nonasymptotic theory for two-layer neural networks: Beyond the bias-variance trade-off
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large neural networks have proved remarkably effective in modern deep learning practice, even in the overparametrized regime where the number of active parameters is large relative to the sample size. This contradicts the classical perspective that a machine learning model must trade off bias and variance for optimal generalization. To resolve this conflict, we present a nonasymptotic generalization theory for two-layer neural networks with ReLU activation function by incorporating scaled variation regularization. Interestingly, the regularizer is equivalent to ridge regression from the angle of gradient-based optimization, but plays a similar role to the group lasso in controlling the model complexity. By exploiting this "ridge-lasso duality," we obtain new prediction bounds for all network widths, which reproduce the double descent phenomenon. Moreover, the overparametrized minimum risk is lower than its underparametrized counterpart when the signal is strong, and is nearly minimax optimal over a suitable class of functions. By contrast, we show that overparametrized random feature models suffer from the curse of dimensionality and thus are suboptimal.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2021.
Builds on
40 of 81 references.
References · 40
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 463
- 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 431
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
28 more
- 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
- 2014Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality with Convex Neural Networkscited by 329
- 2015Norm-Based Capacity Control in Neural Networkscited by 299
- 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 289
- 2018On the Optimization of Deep Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Overparameterizationcited by 280
- 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 194
- 2019Linearized two-layers neural networks in high dimensioncited by 155
- 2018Towards Understanding the Role of Over-Parametrization in Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 140
- 2017Theoretical insights into the optimization landscape of over-parameterized shallow neural networkscited by 128
- 2019Polylogarithmic width suffices for gradient descent to achieve arbitrarily small test error with shallow ReLU networkscited by 120
- 2019A Function Space View of Bounded Norm Infinite Width ReLU Nets: The Multivariate Casecited by 113
- 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 107
- 2018Trainability and Accuracy of Neural Networks: An Interacting Particle System Approachcited by 105
- 2020Neural Networks are Convex Regularizers: Exact Polynomial-time Convex Optimization Formulations for Two-layer Networkscited by 96
- 2021Sharp Bounds on the Approximation Rates, Metric Entropy, and n-widths of Shallow Neural Networkscited by 86
- 2016Approximation by Combinations of ReLU and Squared ReLU Ridge Functions with ℓ1 and ℓ0 Controlscited by 84
- 2020The Interpolation Phase Transition in Neural Networks: Memorization and Generalization under Lazy Trainingcited by 84
- 2019A Model of Double Descent for High-dimensional Binary Linear Classificationcited by 81
- 2018A Priori Estimates of the Population Risk for Two-layer Neural Networkscited by 76
- 2018Deep Neural Networks for Estimation and Inferencecited by 62
- 2020Revealing the Structure of Deep Neural Networks via Convex Dualitycited by 54
- 2019A Comparative Analysis of the Optimization and Generalization Property of Two-layer Neural Network and Random Feature Models Under Gradient Descent Dynamicscited by 49
- 2020A Precise High-Dimensional Asymptotic Theory for Boosting and Minimum-ℓ1-Norm Interpolated Classifierscited by 44
- 2020The Hidden Convex Optimization Landscape of Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks: an Exact Characterization of the Optimal Solutionscited by 30
- 2019On the minimax optimality and superiority of deep neural network learning over sparse parameter spacescited by 24
- 2020On the robustness of minimum norm interpolators and regularized empirical risk minimizerscited by 18
- 2019Training Neural Networks as Learning Data-adaptive Kernels: Provable Representation and Approximation Benefitscited by 13
- 2020On lower bounds for the bias-variance trade-offcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.