mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BayesIMP: Uncertainty Quantification for Causal Data Fusion

arXiv 2106.03477 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While causal models are becoming one of the mainstays of machine learning, the problem of uncertainty quantification in causal inference remains challenging. In this paper, we study the causal data fusion problem, where datasets pertaining to multiple causal graphs are combined to estimate the average treatment effect of a target variable. As data arises from multiple sources and can vary in quality and quantity, principled uncertainty quantification becomes essential. To that end, we introduce Bayesian Interventional Mean Processes, a framework which combines ideas from probabilistic integration and kernel mean embeddings to represent interventional distributions in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space, while taking into account the uncertainty within each causal graph. To demonstrate the utility of our uncertainty estimation, we apply our method to the Causal Bayesian Optimisation task and show improvements over state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2021.

Builds on

13 of 32 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
  2. 2016Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyondcited by 360
  3. 2019Kernel Instrumental Variable Regressioncited by 118
  4. 2020Causal Bayesian Optimizationcited by 39
  5. 2016Large-Scale Kernel Methods for Independence Testingcited by 32
  6. 2018Counterfactual Mean Embeddingscited by 32
  7. 2021Deconditional Downscaling with Gaussian Processescited by 24
  8. 2018Causal Inference via Kernel Deviance Measurescited by 22
  9. 2016Bayesian Learning of Kernel Embeddingscited by 15
  10. 2020Multi-task Causal Learning with Gaussian Processescited by 14
  11. 2019Noise Contrastive Meta-Learning for Conditional Density Estimation using Kernel Mean Embeddingscited by 10
  12. 2017Bayesian Approaches to Distribution Regressioncited by 9
1 more
  1. 2018Hyperparameter Learning for Conditional Kernel Mean Embeddings with Rademacher Complexity Boundscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 6; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Looping in the Human Collaborative and Explainable Bayesian Optimizationcited by 27
  2. 2022Causal Inference Through the Structural Causal Marginal Problemcited by 22
  3. 2023Explaining the Uncertain: Stochastic Shapley Values for Gaussian Process Modelscited by 19
  4. 2021GeneDisco: A Benchmark for Experimental Design in Drug Discoverycited by 18
  5. 2023Calibrating Multimodal Learningcited by 17
  6. 2024Domain Generalisation via Imprecise Learningcited by 14
  7. 2025Integral Imprecise Probability Metricscited by 11
  8. 2023Causal Strategic Learning with Competitive Selectioncited by 9
  9. 2024Neural-Kernel Conditional Mean Embeddingscited by 7
  10. 2025Exact Shapley Attributions in Quadratic-time for FANOVA Gaussian Processescited by 6
  11. 2024An Overview of Causal Inference using Kernel Embeddingscited by 5
  12. 2022Gated Domain Units for Multi-source Domain Generalizationcited by 4
9 more
  1. 2022Causal Inference from Small High-dimensional Datasetscited by 3
  2. 2025Kernel-based estimators for functional causal effectscited by 3
  3. 2022Validation of Composite Systems by Discrepancy Propagationcited by 2
  4. 2024Interventional Processes for Causal Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 2
  5. 2022Sequential Decision Making on Unmatched Data using Bayesian Kernel Embeddingscited by 1
  6. 2025ActiveCQ: Active Estimation of Causal Quantitiescited by 1
  7. 2022Bayesian Counterfactual Mean Embeddings and Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 0
  8. 2025Kernel Quantile Embeddings and Associated Probability Metricscited by 0
  9. 2026ShaplEIG: Bayesian Experimental Design for Shapley Value Estimationcited by 0