mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Detecting Biological Locomotion in Video: A Computational Approach

arXiv 2105.12661 ↗First posted 26 May 2021cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Animals locomote for various reasons: to search for food, find suitable habitat, pursue prey, escape from predators, or seek a mate. The grand scale of biodiversity contributes to the great locomotory design and mode diversity. Various creatures make use of legs, wings, fins and other means to move through the world. In this report, we refer to the locomotion of general biological species as biolocomotion. We present a computational approach to detect biolocomotion in unprocessed video. Significantly, the motion exhibited by the body parts of a biological entity to navigate through an environment can be modeled by a combination of an overall positional advance with an overlaid asymmetric oscillatory pattern, a distinctive signature that tends to be absent in non-biological objects in locomotion. We exploit this key trait of positional advance with asymmetric oscillation along with differences in an object's common motion (extrinsic motion) and localized motion of its parts (intrinsic motion) to detect biolocomotion. An algorithm is developed to measure the presence of these traits in tracked objects to determine if they correspond to a biological entity in locomotion. An alternative algorithm, based on generic features combined with learning is assembled out of components from allied areas of investigation, also is presented as a basis of comparison. A novel biolocomotion dataset encompassing a wide range of moving biological and non-biological objects in natural settings is provided. Also, biolocomotion annotations to an extant camouflage animals dataset are provided. Quantitative results indicate that the proposed algorithm considerably outperforms the alternative approach, supporting the hypothesis that biolocomotion can be detected reliably based on its distinct signature of positional advance with asymmetric oscillation and extrinsic/intrinsic motion dissimilarity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 133 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2021.

Builds on

13 of 133 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  2. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 658
  3. 2016Convolutional Two-Stream Network Fusion for Video Action Recognitioncited by 384
  4. 2018Human Action Recognition and Prediction: A Surveycited by 227
  5. 2015Salient Object Detection: A Benchmarkcited by 131
  6. 2015A Novel Performance Evaluation Methodology for Single-Target Trackerscited by 113
  7. 2019The 2019 DAVIS Challenge on VOS: Unsupervised Multi-Object Segmentationcited by 97
  8. 2016It's Moving! A Probabilistic Model for Causal Motion Segmentation in Moving Camera Videoscited by 71
  9. 2019Video Object Segmentation and Tracking: A Surveycited by 50
  10. 2018Real-World Repetition Estimation by Div, Grad and Curlcited by 21
  11. 2016Review of Action Recognition and Detection Methodscited by 13
  12. 2016Recovering the number of clusters in data sets with noise features using feature rescaling factorscited by 7
1 more
  1. 2018Tracking Noisy Targets: A Review of Recent Object Tracking Approachescited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.