Revisiting Knowledge Distillation for Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The existing solutions for object detection distillation rely on the availability of both a teacher model and ground-truth labels. We propose a new perspective to relax this constraint. In our framework, a student is first trained with pseudo labels generated by the teacher, and then fine-tuned using labeled data, if any available. Extensive experiments demonstrate improvements over existing object detection distillation algorithms. In addition, decoupling the teacher and ground-truth distillation in this framework provides interesting properties such: as 1) using unlabeled data to further improve the student's performance, 2) combining multiple teacher models of different architectures, even with different object categories, and 3) reducing the need for labeled data (with only 20% of COCO labels, this method achieves the same performance as the model trained on the entire set of labels). Furthermore, a by-product of this approach is the potential usage for domain adaptation. We verify these properties through extensive experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2021.
Builds on
32 of 44 references.
References · 32
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
- 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
- 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
20 more
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
- 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,059
- 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,018
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
- 2019Dreaming to Distill: Data-free Knowledge Transfer via DeepInversioncited by 419
- 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
- 2020A Simple Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Object Detectioncited by 282
- 2019Data-Free Learning of Student Networkscited by 203
- 2019Distilling Object Detectors with Fine-grained Feature Imitationcited by 188
- 2019Scale-Aware Trident Networks for Object Detectioncited by 159
- 2017Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Deep Neural Networkscited by 136
- 2019Zero-shot Knowledge Transfer via Adversarial Belief Matchingcited by 129
- 2019Zero-Shot Knowledge Distillation in Deep Networkscited by 119
- 2018A Closer Look at Deep Learning Heuristics: Learning rate restarts, Warmup and Distillationcited by 110
- 2017Light-Head R-CNN: In Defense of Two-Stage Object Detectorcited by 30
- 2019Unifying Heterogeneous Classifiers with Distillationcited by 24
- 2018Object detection at 200 Frames Per Secondcited by 5
- 2019Efficient Object Embedding for Spliced Image Retrievalcited by 2
- 2018Distilling with Performance Enhanced Studentscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.