mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dependency Parsing with Bottom-up Hierarchical Pointer Networks

arXiv 2105.09611 ↗First posted 20 May 2021cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dependency parsing is a crucial step towards deep language understanding and, therefore, widely demanded by numerous Natural Language Processing applications. In particular, left-to-right and top-down transition-based algorithms that rely on Pointer Networks are among the most accurate approaches for performing dependency parsing. Additionally, it has been observed for the top-down algorithm that Pointer Networks' sequential decoding can be improved by implementing a hierarchical variant, more adequate to model dependency structures. Considering all this, we develop a bottom-up-oriented Hierarchical Pointer Network for the left-to-right parser and propose two novel transition-based alternatives: an approach that parses a sentence in right-to-left order and a variant that does it from the outside in. We empirically test the proposed neural architecture with the different algorithms on a wide variety of languages, outperforming the original approach in practically all of them and setting new state-of-the-art results on the English and Chinese Penn Treebanks for non-contextualized and BERT-based embeddings.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2021.

Builds on

25 of 49 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  4. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 895
  5. 2016End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRFcited by 341
  6. 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
  7. 2021Syntax-BERT: Improving Pre-trained Transformers with Syntax Treescited by 51
  8. 2020Efficient Second-Order TreeCRF for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 48
  9. 2020Do Syntax Trees Help Pre-trained Transformers Extract Information?cited by 48
  10. 2019Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Parsing on Penn Treebankcited by 43
  11. 2018Stack-Pointer Networks for Dependency Parsingcited by 36
  12. 2018Anaphora and Coreference Resolution: A Reviewcited by 31
13 more
  1. 2019Left-to-Right Dependency Parsing with Pointer Networkscited by 21
  2. 2020Recursive Non-Autoregressive Graph-to-Graph Transformer for Dependency Parsing with Iterative Refinementcited by 20
  3. 2013Polyglot: Distributed Word Representations for Multilingual NLPcited by 19
  4. 2020Second-Order Neural Dependency Parsing with Message Passing and End-to-End Trainingcited by 17
  5. 2018Interpretable Visual Question Answering by Reasoning on Dependency Treescited by 15
  6. 2016Dependency Parsing as Head Selectioncited by 13
  7. 2019Deep Contextualized Word Embeddings in Transition-Based and Graph-Based Dependency Parsing -- A Tale of Two Parsers Revisitedcited by 13
  8. 2020Multitask Pointer Network for Multi-Representational Parsingcited by 12
  9. 2019Syntax-Enhanced Neural Machine Translation with Syntax-Aware Word Representationscited by 10
  10. 2019Hierarchical Pointer Net Parsingcited by 8
  11. 2019Global Greedy Dependency Parsingcited by 8
  12. 2017Neural Probabilistic Model for Non-projective MST Parsingcited by 6
  13. 2018From POS tagging to dependency parsing for biomedical event extractioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

5 papers.