mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dependency Parsing as Head Selection

arXiv 1606.01280 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2016cs.CL cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conventional graph-based dependency parsers guarantee a tree structure both during training and inference. Instead, we formalize dependency parsing as the problem of independently selecting the head of each word in a sentence. Our model which we call textscDeNSe (as shorthand for bf Dependency bf Neural bf Selection) produces a distribution over possible heads for each word using features obtained from a bidirectional recurrent neural network. Without enforcing structural constraints during training, textscDeNSe generates (at inference time) trees for the overwhelming majority of sentences, while non-tree outputs can be adjusted with a maximum spanning tree algorithm. We evaluate textscDeNSe on four languages (English, Chinese, Czech, and German) with varying degrees of non-projectivity. Despite the simplicity of the approach, our parsers are on par with the state of the art.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: