mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Costly is Noise? Data and Disparities in Consumer Credit

arXiv 2105.07554 ↗First posted 17 May 2021econ.GN cs.LG q-fin.ECcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that lenders face more uncertainty when assessing default risk of historically under-served groups in US credit markets and that this information disparity is a quantitatively important driver of inefficient and unequal credit market outcomes. We first document that widely used credit scores are statistically noisier indicators of default risk for historically under-served groups. This noise emerges primarily through the explanatory power of the underlying credit report data (e.g., thin credit files), not through issues with model fit (e.g., the inability to include protected class in the scoring model). Estimating a structural model of lending with heterogeneity in information, we quantify the gains from addressing these information disparities for the US mortgage market. We find that equalizing the precision of credit scores can reduce disparities in approval rates and in credit misallocation for disadvantaged groups by approximately half.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2021.

Builds on

5 of 79 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  2. 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
  3. 2019Recovering from Biased Data: Can Fairness Constraints Improve Accuracy?cited by 50
  4. 2018Predicting Race and Ethnicity From the Sequence of Characters in a Namecited by 24
  5. 2020To Split or Not to Split: The Impact of Disparate Treatment in Classificationcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

8 papers.