mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

InfoGram and Admissible Machine Learning

arXiv 2108.07380 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2021stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We have entered a new era of machine learning (ML), where the most accurate algorithm with superior predictive power may not even be deployable, unless it is admissible under the regulatory constraints. This has led to great interest in developing fair, transparent and trustworthy ML methods. The purpose of this article is to introduce a new information-theoretic learning framework (admissible machine learning) and algorithmic risk-management tools (InfoGram, L-features, ALFA-testing) that can guide an analyst to redesign off-the-shelf ML methods to be regulatory compliant, while maintaining good prediction accuracy. We have illustrated our approach using several real-data examples from financial sectors, biomedical research, marketing campaigns, and the criminal justice system.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2021.

Builds on

5 of 30 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
  2. 2019"How do I fool you?": Manipulating User Trust via Misleading Black Box Explanationscited by 111
  3. 2020Ridge Regularization: an Essential Concept in Data Sciencecited by 19
  4. 2021How Costly is Noise? Data and Disparities in Consumer Creditcited by 8
  5. 2020Breiman's "Two Cultures" Revisited and Reconciledcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.