mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robustness Evaluation and Adversarial Training of an Instance Segmentation Model

arXiv 2206.02539 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To evaluate the robustness of non-classifier models, we propose probabilistic local equivalence, based on the notion of randomized smoothing, as a way to quantitatively evaluate the robustness of an arbitrary function. In addition, to understand the effect of adversarial training on non-classifiers and to investigate the level of robustness that can be obtained without degrading performance on the training distribution, we apply Fast is Better than Free adversarial training together with the TRADES robust loss to the training of an instance segmentation network. In this direction, we were able to achieve a symmetric best dice score of 0.85 on the TuSimple lane detection challenge, outperforming the standardly-trained network's score of 0.82. Additionally, we were able to obtain an F-measure of 0.49 on manipulated inputs, in contrast to the standardly-trained network's score of 0. We show that probabilisitic local equivalence is able to successfully distinguish between standardly-trained and adversarially-trained models, providing another view of the improved robustness of the adversarially-trained models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2022.

Builds on

22 of 37 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  5. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  6. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  7. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  8. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  9. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  10. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  11. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  12. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
10 more
  1. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  2. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
  3. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
  4. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
  5. 2016Wider or Deeper: Revisiting the ResNet Model for Visual Recognitioncited by 184
  6. 2018Towards End-to-End Lane Detection: an Instance Segmentation Approachcited by 129
  7. 2017Semantic Instance Segmentation with a Discriminative Loss Functioncited by 118
  8. 2021Scalable Certified Segmentation via Randomized Smoothingcited by 35
  9. 2021How Costly is Noise? Data and Disparities in Consumer Creditcited by 8
  10. 2020Adversarial Attacks on Binary Image Recognition Systemscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.