mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Finite volume method network for acceleration of unsteady computational fluid dynamics: non-reacting and reacting flows

arXiv 2105.03332 ↗First posted 7 May 2021cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite rapid improvements in the performance of central processing unit (CPU), the calculation cost of simulating chemically reacting flow using CFD remains infeasible in many cases. The application of the convolutional neural networks (CNNs) specialized in image processing in flow field prediction has been studied, but the need to develop a neural netweork design fitted for CFD is recently emerged. In this study, a neural network model introducing the finite volume method (FVM) with a unique network architecture and physics-informed loss function was developed to accelerate CFD simulations. The developed network model, considering the nature of the CFD flow field where the identical governing equations are applied to all grids, can predict the future fields with only two previous fields unlike the CNNs requiring many field images (>10,000). The performance of this baseline model was evaluated using CFD time series data from non-reacting flow and reacting flow simulation; counterflow and hydrogen flame with 20 detailed chemistries. Consequently, we demonstrated that (1) the FVM-based network architecture provided improved accuracy of multistep time series prediction compared to the previous MLP model (2) the physic-informed loss function prevented non-physical overfitting problem and ultimately reduced the error in time series prediction (3) observing the calculated residuals in an unsupervised manner could indirectly estimate the network accuracy. Additionally, under the reacting flow dataset, the computational speed of this network model was measured to be about 10 times faster than that of the CFD solver.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2021.

Builds on

15 of 56 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 461
  3. 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 358
  4. 2019Prediction of Aerodynamic Flow Fields Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 144
  5. 2016Accelerating Eulerian Fluid Simulation With Convolutional Networkscited by 128
  6. 2019On the Impact of the Activation Function on Deep Neural Networks Trainingcited by 101
  7. 2019The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goalscited by 100
  8. 2021Stiff Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 77
  9. 2020Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantitiescited by 46
  10. 2020CFDNet: a deep learning-based accelerator for fluid simulationscited by 40
  11. 2018Deep Neural Networks for Data-Driven Turbulence Modelscited by 35
  12. 2020FiniteNet: A Fully Convolutional LSTM Network Architecture for Time-Dependent Partial Differential Equationscited by 14
3 more
  1. 2021Finite Volume Neural Network: Modeling Subsurface Contaminant Transportcited by 14
  2. 2015On Vectorization of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Vision Taskscited by 3
  3. 2021A Baseline Model for Software Effort Estimationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

12 papers.