Physics-Informed Machine Learning Regulated by Finite Element Analysis for Simulation Acceleration of Melt Pool Dynamics in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Efficient simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is crucial for process prediction due to the lasting issue of high computational cost associated with traditional numerical methods such as finite element analysis (FEA). While a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) can predict solution fields with small training data and enables the generalization of new process parameters via transfer learning, it suffers from accuracy degradation in time-dependent problems due to the accumulation of residual and the difficulty in capturing the steep spatial and temporal gradients inherent in the LPBF process. To overcome this issue, this study develops an efficient modeling framework, FEA-Regulated Physics-Informed Neural Network (FEA-PINN), to accelerate the prediction of melt pool dynamics phenomena in an LPBF process while maintaining the FEA accuracy. The innovation of FEA-PINN manifested itself in two aspects. First, a novel strategy has been developed within the PINN model to capture the dynamic phase change of powder-liquid-solid, enabling the tracking of material status during laser melting. The model further incorporates temperature-dependent material properties, phase change behavior of the powder bed, Marangoni convection, and natural convection within the melt pool. Second, the FEA-PINN framework integrates corrective FEA simulations during inference to enforce physical consistency, reduce error drift, and capture the steep gradients. A comparative analysis shows that FEA-PINN achieves accuracy comparable to FEA while significantly reducing computational cost. The framework has been validated against benchmark FEA data for single-track scanning in LPBF.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2025.
Builds on
9 of 38 references.
References · 9
- 2021Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learningcited by 138
- 2020Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: Predicting temperature and melt pool fluid dynamics using physics-informed neural networkscited by 42
- 2022Residual-based physics-informed transfer learning: A hybrid method for accelerating long-term CFD simulations via deep learningcited by 14
- 2022Hybrid thermal modeling of additive manufacturing processes using physics-informed neural networks for temperature prediction and parameter identificationcited by 14
- 2021Finite volume method network for acceleration of unsteady computational fluid dynamics: non-reacting and reacting flowscited by 12
- 2023Review of Machine Learning Methods for Additive Manufacturing of Functionally Graded Materialscited by 4
- 2024Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Smart Additive Manufacturingcited by 3
- 2023Physics-Informed Machine Learning of Argon Gas-Driven Melt Pool Dynamicscited by 2
- 2024Thermal-Mechanical Physics Informed Deep Learning For Fast Prediction of Thermal Stress Evolution in Laser Metal Depositioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.