mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Learning Applications to Computational Plasma Physics and Reduced-Order Plasma Modeling: A Perspective

arXiv 2409.02349 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2024physics.plasm-ph cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) provides a broad spectrum of tools and architectures that enable the transformation of data from simulations and experiments into useful and explainable science, thereby augmenting domain knowledge. Furthermore, ML-enhanced numerical modelling can revamp scientific computing for real-world complex engineering systems, creating unique opportunities to examine the operation of the technologies in detail and automate their optimization and control. In recent years, ML applications have seen significant growth across various scientific domains, particularly in fluid mechanics, where ML has shown great promise in enhancing computational modeling of fluid flows. In contrast, ML applications in numerical plasma physics research remain relatively limited in scope and extent. Despite this, the close relationship between fluid mechanics and plasma physics presents a valuable opportunity to create a roadmap for transferring ML advances in fluid flow modeling to computational plasma physics. This Perspective aims to outline such a roadmap. We begin by discussing some general fundamental aspects of ML, including the various categories of ML algorithms and the different types of problems that can be solved with the help of ML. With regard to each problem type, we then present specific examples from the use of ML in computational fluid dynamics, reviewing several insightful prior efforts. We also review recent ML applications in plasma physics for each problem type. The paper discusses promising future directions and development pathways for ML in plasma modelling within the different application areas. Additionally, we point out prominent challenges that must be addressed to realize ML's full potential in computational plasma physics, including the need for cost-effective high-fidelity simulation tools for extensive data generation.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 191 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2024.

Builds on

41 of 191 references.

References · 41

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  3. 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 491
  4. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 470
  5. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 461
  6. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
  7. 2024Reinforcement learningcited by 236
  8. 2017Learning Koopman Invariant Subspaces for Dynamic Mode Decompositioncited by 156
  9. 2018Data-Driven Forecasting of High-Dimensional Chaotic Systems with Long Short-Term Memory Networkscited by 155
  10. 2020Weak SINDy For Partial Differential Equationscited by 154
  11. 2017Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limitcited by 139
  12. 2021Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learningcited by 137
29 more
  1. 2017VAMPnets: Deep learning of molecular kineticscited by 135
  2. 2021Ensemble-SINDy: Robust sparse model discovery in the low-data, high-noise limit, with active learning and controlcited by 134
  3. 2017Learning Deep Neural Network Representations for Koopman Operators of Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 125
  4. 2020SINDy-PI: A Robust Algorithm for Parallel Implicit Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 125
  5. 2018Deep Fluids: A Generative Network for Parameterized Fluid Simulationscited by 121
  6. 2020A fast and accurate physics-informed neural network reduced order model with shallow masked autoencodercited by 80
  7. 2021Physics-informed neural networks for solving Reynolds-averaged Navierunicodex2013Stokes equationscited by 68
  8. 2021The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?cited by 61
  9. 2019A unified sparse optimization framework to learn parsimonious physics-informed models from datacited by 49
  10. 2021Towards extraction of orthogonal and parsimonious non-linear modes from turbulent flowscited by 44
  11. 2021A Framework for Machine Learning of Model Error in Dynamical Systemscited by 37
  12. 2020Automatic Differentiation to Simultaneously Identify Nonlinear Dynamics and Extract Noise Probability Distributions from Datacited by 36
  13. 2021Bagging, optimized dynamic mode decomposition (BOP-DMD) for robust, stable forecasting with spatial and temporal uncertainty-quantificationcited by 30
  14. 2022Data-Driven Modeling and Prediction of Non-Linearizable Dynamics via Spectral Submanifoldscited by 25
  15. 2022Bayesian autoencoders for data-driven discovery of coordinates, governing equations and fundamental constantscited by 24
  16. 2022Physics-informed deep-learning applications to experimental fluid mechanicscited by 21
  17. 2018Deep Generative Markov State Modelscited by 19
  18. 2020Enhancement of shock-capturing methods via machine learningcited by 16
  19. 2022Discrepancy Modeling Framework: Learning missing physics, modeling systematic residuals, and disambiguating between deterministic and random effectscited by 15
  20. 2020FiniteNet: A Fully Convolutional LSTM Network Architecture for Time-Dependent Partial Differential Equationscited by 14
  21. 2021Finite volume method network for acceleration of unsteady computational fluid dynamics: non-reacting and reacting flowscited by 12
  22. 2023Leveraging arbitrary mobile sensor trajectories with shallow recurrent decoder networks for full-state reconstructioncited by 12
  23. 2024Shallow Recurrent Decoder for Reduced Order Modeling of Plasma Dynamicscited by 8
  24. 2023Generative Adversarial Reduced Order Modellingcited by 7
  25. 2023Dynamic Mode Decomposition for data-driven analysis and reduced-order modelling of ExB plasmas: II. dynamics forecastingcited by 7
  26. 2024Data-driven local operator finding for reduced-order modelling of plasma systems: I. Concept and verificationscited by 5
  27. 2024Data-driven local operator finding for reduced-order modelling of plasma systems: II. Application to parametric dynamicscited by 5
  28. 2021A Deep Learning-Based Particle-in-Cell Method for Plasma Simulationscited by 4
  29. 2023Unsupervised classification of fully kinetic simulations of plasmoid instability using Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs)cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.