mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Model-Agnostic AI Framework with Explicit Time Integration for Long-Term Fluid Dynamics Prediction

arXiv 2412.05657 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2024cs.LG physics.flu-dyncited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study addresses the critical challenge of error accumulation in spatio-temporal auto-regressive (AR) predictions within scientific machine learning models by exploring temporal integration schemes and adaptive multi-step rollout strategies. We introduce the first implementation of the two-step Adams-Bashforth method specifically tailored for data-driven AR prediction, leveraging historical derivative information to enhance numerical stability without additional computational overhead. To validate our approach, we systematically evaluate time integration schemes across canonical 2D PDEs before extending to complex Navier-Stokes cylinder vortex shedding dynamics. Additionally, we develop three novel adaptive weighting strategies that dynamically adjust the importance of different future time steps during multi-step rollout training. Our analysis reveals that as physical complexity increases, such sophisticated rollout techniques become essential, with the Adams-Bashforth scheme demonstrating consistent robustness across investigated systems and our best adaptive approach delivering an 89% improvement over conventional fixed-weight methods while maintaining similar computational costs. For the complex Navier-Stokes vortex shedding problem, despite using an extremely lightweight graph neural network with just 1,177 trainable parameters and training on only 50 snapshots, our framework accurately predicts 350 future time steps reducing mean squared error from 0.125 (single-step direct prediction) to 0.002 (Adams-Bashforth with proposed multi-step rollout). Our integrated methodology demonstrates an 83% improvement over standard noise injection techniques and maintains robustness under severe spatial constraints; specifically, when trained on only a partial spatial domain, it still achieves 58% and 27% improvements over direct prediction and forward Euler methods, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2024.

Builds on

16 of 39 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 867
  4. 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 840
  5. 2019Graph U-Netscited by 489
  6. 2023β-Variational autoencoders and transformers for reduced-order modelling of fluid flowscited by 76
  7. 2022Multi-resolution partial differential equations preserved learning framework for spatiotemporal dynamicscited by 44
  8. 2023Bayesian Conditional Diffusion Models for Versatile Spatiotemporal Turbulence Generationcited by 28
  9. 2024Differentiability in Unrolled Training of Neural Physics Simulators on Transient Dynamicscited by 25
  10. 2020Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Body Force Predictioncited by 16
  11. 2022Learning Large-scale Subsurface Simulations with a Hybrid Graph Network Simulatorcited by 15
  12. 2022Residual-based physics-informed transfer learning: A hybrid method for accelerating long-term CFD simulations via deep learningcited by 14
4 more
  1. 2024Strategies for Pretraining Neural Operatorscited by 14
  2. 2021Finite volume method network for acceleration of unsteady computational fluid dynamics: non-reacting and reacting flowscited by 12
  3. 2024Data-Driven Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Digital Twin Perspectivecited by 12
  4. 2024Enhancing Graph U-Nets for Mesh-Agnostic Spatio-Temporal Flow Predictioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.