mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Extended Jump Functions Benchmark for the Analysis of Randomized Search Heuristics

arXiv 2105.03090 ↗First posted 7 May 2021cs.NE cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Jump functions are the most-studied non-unimodal benchmark in the theory of randomized search heuristics, in particular, evolutionary algorithms (EAs). They have significantly improved our understanding of how EAs escape from local optima. However, their particular structure -- to leave the local optimum one can only jump directly to the global optimum -- raises the question of how representative such results are. For this reason, we propose an extended class textscJumpk,δ of jump functions that contain a valley of low fitness of width δ starting at distance k from the global optimum. We prove that several previous results extend to this more general class: for all k ≤ fracn1/3lnn and δ < k, the optimal mutation rate for the (1+1)~EA is fracδn, and the fast (1+1)~EA runs faster than the classical (1+1)~EA by a factor super-exponential in δ. However, we also observe that some known results do not generalize: the randomized local search algorithm with stagnation detection, which is faster than the fast (1+1)~EA by a factor polynomial in k on textscJumpk, is slower by a factor polynomial in n on some textscJumpk,δ instances. Computationally, the new class allows experiments with wider fitness valleys, especially when they lie further away from the global optimum.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2021.

Builds on

22 of 72 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Fast Genetic Algorithmscited by 29
  2. 2020Does Comma Selection Help To Cope With Local Optimacited by 15
  3. 2020Self-Adjusting Evolutionary Algorithms for Multimodal Optimizationcited by 15
  4. 2019The Runtime of the Compact Genetic Algorithm on Jump Functionscited by 13
  5. 2018Better Runtime Guarantees Via Stochastic Dominationcited by 12
  6. 2021Stagnation Detection with Randomized Local Searchcited by 11
  7. 2021Lazy Parameter Tuning and Control: Choosing All Parameters Randomly From a Power-Law Distributioncited by 11
  8. 2020Runtime Analysis of a Heavy-Tailed (1+(λ,λ)) Genetic Algorithm on Jump Functionscited by 10
  9. 2020Fixed-Target Runtime Analysiscited by 9
  10. 2020First Steps Towards a Runtime Analysis When Starting With a Good Solutioncited by 9
  11. 2019On the Limitations of the Univariate Marginal Distribution Algorithm to Deception and Where Bivariate EDAs might helpcited by 8
  12. 2021Stagnation Detection in Highly Multimodal Fitness Landscapescited by 8
10 more
  1. 2020The Univariate Marginal Distribution Algorithm Copes Well With Deception and Epistasiscited by 7
  2. 2015First Steps Towards a Runtime Comparison of Natural and Artificial Evolutioncited by 6
  3. 2018Evolutionary Algorithms and Submodular Functions: Benefits of Heavy-Tailed Mutationscited by 6
  4. 2018Fast Artificial Immune Systemscited by 5
  5. 2021Lower Bounds from Fitness Levels Made Easycited by 5
  6. 2017Standard Steady State Genetic Algorithms Can Hillclimb Faster than Mutation-only Evolutionary Algorithmscited by 4
  7. 2019On the Benefits of Populations on the Exploitation Speed of Standard Steady-State Genetic Algorithmscited by 4
  8. 2014How Crossover Speeds Up Building-Block Assembly in Genetic Algorithmscited by 3
  9. 2017Theoretical Analysis of Stochastic Search Algorithmscited by 3
  10. 2015Solving Problems with Unknown Solution Length at (Almost) No Extra Costcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.