On the Benefits of Populations on the Exploitation Speed of Standard Steady-State Genetic Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is generally accepted that populations are useful for the global exploration of multi-modal optimisation problems. Indeed, several theoretical results are available showing such advantages over single-trajectory search heuristics. In this paper we provide evidence that evolving populations via crossover and mutation may also benefit the optimisation time for hillclimbing unimodal functions. In particular, we prove bounds on the expected runtime of the standard (μ+1)~GA for OneMax that are lower than its unary black box complexity and decrease in the leading constant with the population size up to μ=O(√log n). Our analysis suggests that the optimal mutation strategy is to flip two bits most of the time. To achieve the results we provide two interesting contributions to the theory of randomised search heuristics: 1) A novel application of drift analysis which compares absorption times of different Markov chains without defining an explicit potential function. 2) The inversion of fundamental matrices to calculate the absorption times of the Markov chains. The latter strategy was previously proposed in the literature but to the best of our knowledge this is the first time is has been used to show non-trivial bounds on expected runtimes.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021On Steady-State Evolutionary Algorithms and Selective Pressure: Why Inverse Rank-Based Allocation of Reproductive Trials is Bestcited by 3
- 2021An Extended Jump Functions Benchmark for the Analysis of Randomized Search Heuristicscited by 3
- 2023(1+1) Genetic Programming With Functionally Complete Instruction Sets Can Evolve Boolean Conjunctions and Disjunctions with Arbitrarily Small Errorcited by 1
- 2026Parent Selection Mechanisms in Elitist Crossover-Based Algorithmscited by 0
- 2026Parent Selection Mechanisms in Elitist Crossover-Based Algorithms5 Apr 2026
- 2023(1+1) Genetic Programming With Functionally Complete Instruction Sets Can Evolve Boolean Conjunctions and Disjunctions with Arbitrarily Small Error13 Mar 2023
- 2021An Extended Jump Functions Benchmark for the Analysis of Randomized Search Heuristics7 May 2021
- 2021On Steady-State Evolutionary Algorithms and Selective Pressure: Why Inverse Rank-Based Allocation of Reproductive Trials is Best18 Mar 2021