Stagnation Detection with Randomized Local Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently a mechanism called stagnation detection was proposed that automatically adjusts the mutation rate of evolutionary algorithms when they encounter local optima. The so-called SD-(1+1)EA introduced by Rajabi and Witt (GECCO 2020) adds stagnation detection to the classical (1+1)EA with standard bit mutation, which flips each bit independently with some mutation rate, and raises the mutation rate when the algorithm is likely to have encountered local optima. In this paper, we investigate stagnation detection in the context of the k-bit flip operator of randomized local search that flips k bits chosen uniformly at random and let stagnation detection adjust the parameter k. We obtain improved runtime results compared to the SD-(1+1)EA amounting to a speed-up of up to e=2.71dots Moreover, we propose additional schemes that prevent infinite optimization times even if the algorithm misses a working choice of k due to unlucky events. Finally, we present an example where standard bit mutation still outperforms the local k-bit flip with stagnation detection.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2022A First Runtime Analysis of the NSGA-II on a Multimodal Problemcited by 15
- 2021Lazy Parameter Tuning and Control: Choosing All Parameters Randomly From a Power-Law Distributioncited by 11
- 2021Lower Bounds from Fitness Levels Made Easycited by 5
- 2021Choosing the Right Algorithm With Hints From Complexity Theorycited by 5
- 2023How the Move Acceptance Hyper-Heuristic Copes With Local Optima: Drastic Differences Between Jumps and Cliffscited by 5
- 2021An Extended Jump Functions Benchmark for the Analysis of Randomized Search Heuristicscited by 3
- 2024Hyper-Heuristics Can Profit From Global Variation Operatorscited by 3
- 2022Privacy against Real-Time Speech Emotion Detection via Acoustic Adversarial Evasion of Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2023How Well Does the Metropolis Algorithm Cope With Local Optima?cited by 2
- 2026Selection Hyper-heuristics Can Automatically Adjust the Learning Period to Optimally Solve Pseudo-Boolean Problemscited by 1
- 2022Runtime Analysis for Permutation-based Evolutionary Algorithmscited by 0
- 2026Selection Hyper-heuristics Can Automatically Adjust the Learning Period to Optimally Solve Pseudo-Boolean Problems28 May 2026
- 2024Hyper-Heuristics Can Profit From Global Variation Operators19 Jul 2024
- 2023How Well Does the Metropolis Algorithm Cope With Local Optima?21 Apr 2023
- 2023How the Move Acceptance Hyper-Heuristic Copes With Local Optima: Drastic Differences Between Jumps and Cliffs20 Apr 2023
- 2022Privacy against Real-Time Speech Emotion Detection via Acoustic Adversarial Evasion of Machine Learning17 Nov 2022
- 2022Runtime Analysis for Permutation-based Evolutionary Algorithms5 Jul 2022
- 2022A First Runtime Analysis of the NSGA-II on a Multimodal Problem28 Apr 2022
- 2021Choosing the Right Algorithm With Hints From Complexity Theory14 Sep 2021
- 2021An Extended Jump Functions Benchmark for the Analysis of Randomized Search Heuristics7 May 2021
- 2021Lazy Parameter Tuning and Control: Choosing All Parameters Randomly From a Power-Law Distribution14 Apr 2021
- 2021Lower Bounds from Fitness Levels Made Easy7 Apr 2021