mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Runtime of the Compact Genetic Algorithm on Jump Functions

arXiv 1908.06527 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2019cs.NE cs.DScited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the first and so far only mathematical runtime analysis of an estimation-of-distribution algorithm (EDA) on a multimodal problem, Hasen"ohrl and Sutton (GECCO 2018) showed for any k = o(n) that the compact genetic algorithm (cGA) with any hypothetical population size μ = Omega(ne4k + n3.5+varepsilon) with high probability finds the optimum of the n-dimensional jump function with jump size k in time O(μ n1.5 log n). We significantly improve this result for small jump sizes k ≤ frac 1 20 ln n -1. In this case, already for μ = Omega(√ n log n) cap poly(n) the runtime of the cGA with high probability is only O(μ √ n). For the smallest admissible values of μ, our result gives a runtime of O(n log n), whereas the previous one only shows O(n5+varepsilon). Since it is known that the cGA with high probability needs at least Omega(μ √ n) iterations to optimize the unimodal OneMx function, our result shows that the cGA in contrast to most classic evolutionary algorithms here is able to cross moderate-sized valleys of low fitness at no extra cost. For large k, we show that the exponential (in k) runtime guarantee of Hasen"ohrl and Sutton is tight and cannot be improved, also not by using a smaller hypothetical population size. We prove that any choice of the hypothetical population size leads to a runtime that, with high probability, is at least exponential in the jump size k. This result might be the first non-trivial exponential lower bound for EDAs that holds for arbitrary parameter settings.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: