mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Algorithmic Factors Influencing Bias in Machine Learning

arXiv 2104.14014 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is fair to say that many of the prominent examples of bias in Machine Learning (ML) arise from bias that is there in the training data. In fact, some would argue that supervised ML algorithms cannot be biased, they reflect the data on which they are trained. In this paper we demonstrate how ML algorithms can misrepresent the training data through underestimation. We show how irreducible error, regularization and feature and class imbalance can contribute to this underestimation. The paper concludes with a demonstration of how the careful management of synthetic counterfactuals can ameliorate the impact of this underestimation bias.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2021.

Builds on

8 of 25 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  3. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  4. 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 164
  5. 2020Characterising Bias in Compressed Modelscited by 162
  6. 2020Good Counterfactuals and Where to Find Them: A Case-Based Technique for Generating Counterfactuals for Explainable AI (XAI)cited by 79
  7. 2016Auditing Black-box Models for Indirect Influencecited by 41
  8. 2020Underestimation Bias and Underfitting in Machine Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 3.

9 papers.